NewZealand-Challenging

June 12, 2014

NewZealand-Challenging

 

 

 

Challenging the Entrenched Orthodoxy

1632 was a simple time for academics. You were either part of the entrenched orthodox establishment headed by Pope Urban VIII, or you were an enemy of the (papal) state. In that case, if lucky, you were in jail; If unlucky, you were tied to a burning at-the-stake as a heretic. By that dubious standard, Galileo was a lucky man.

 

Challenging the Church orthodoxy, Galileo had proclaimed that he had empirically proved what mathematician Nicolaus Copernicus had predicted – that the sun, not the earth, was the center of the solar system. Galileo was propounding heliocentrism - the theory (now act) that the sun was the center of the solar system.

The Church at the time taught geocentricism, the concept that the earth was the center of the solar system. The local sycophant astronomers and academics adamantly backed the Church’s position. To the Church, geocentricism represented the central place of mankind, as God’s children, as the central point of the universe. That the geocentric model made the orbits of the planets a random, chaotic mess was, to the Church, rather unimportant: accuracy wasn’t its focus; orthodoxy and power were the focus.

Galileo’s own primary goal was science/truth. The scientist noted that when the sun was placed at the center of the solar system, all the haphazard twisting and turning of the heavenly bodies suddenly became ordered. What appeared to be chaos was, in fact, an orderly system which was just being viewed incorrectly. And so heliocentricism, the theory that the sun was the center of the solar system, was proven.

But Galileo’s work threatened the Church’s orthodoxy and its monopoly on truth and power. As such, the Church ordered Galileo to recant his observations. Being a scientist and a man of truth, Galileo refused. For that principled stance, he was ordered under house arrest for the rest of his life.

Unfortunately, the same Orwellian spirit that sought to crush Galileo is alive and well today. Ironically, the same gambits emanate from the historical arch-enemy of the Church. Picking up the orthodoxy banner which the medieval Church set down are the contemporary British academic atheists. And replacing geocentricism as the cause to be shielded from challenge is Randomness/atheism Theory. Just as their arch-enemy the Church did before them, the British academic hierarchy appears more interested in maintaining their theory’s dominant position and their own personal quasi-monopoly on academic power. Indeed, the British Randomness/atheist group employs parallel tactics as those previously employed by the Church.

Instead of engaging or debating challenging theories, the entrenched academic orthodoxy has seen fit to attack and delegitimize intellectual challengers. For over two decades the academic orthodoxy has employed these tactics to keep would-be challengers and their supporters at bay and in fear of speaking out.

In 1988, metaphysicist, private scholar, and academic outsider David Birnbaum published the first of his two part treatise, Summa Metaphysica. In it, Birnbaum proposes his signature Potentialism Theory. Birnbaum’s theory head on challenges the academic orthodoxy’s Randomness Theory – challenging its academic monopoly in science and philosophy. The groundbreaking nature of Potential Theory and its direct undermining of Randomness Theory set off tremors across the academic and journalistic world.

Birnbaum’s theory vectors back to one concept ‘potential’. Depending upon just how much divinity we do or do not bestow onto that one dynamic – and it is the individual’s choice – Religious Man, Spiritual Man, and Secular Man can each lock-in to the theory’s elegant and overarching edifice. Indeed the individual has the metaphysical freedom to choose. And the potential-affirming author leaves that flexibility open in the architecture of his proposed metaphysics. Potentialism is an elegant scientific theory available to all; hence the panic of the atheist group.

Birnbaum’s theory has been well received in universities globally; it has used as a course text in classes at over a dozen higher learning institutions. Potential Theory has garnered a large and growing number of supporters amongst the scientific and academic community. Birnbaum’s Infinite Potential concept provides a bridge of cohesion between what is commonly viewed as separate spiritual and secular domains. Infinite Potential not only embraces both spiritual and secular beliefs, it provides meaning and context for them.

Many British academics cling to Randomness Theory as the key answer to all universe questions, averse to seriously entertaining any theories which might contradict it. However, for all its lauded strengths, Randomness Theory actually does little to answer any important questions. Instead it speaks of the random causality of the universe’s existence. “Things just happen.” Respectfully, this is not science, it is surrender. Nor is it even a theory; it is more the absence of a theory.

The dynamic of Potential/Possibility creates a bridge that changes the nature of metaphysics and universal theory. In one model, Potential Theory is able to satisfy both the spiritual and scientific worlds. The divine can be expressed to the scientific community in terms which they can comprehend. Not a leap of faith, but a predictive derivative of the universe by its very definition. Likewise, the theory presents evolution in that terms religion can comprehend and accept, not as a random series of events driven by survival, but rather as a purpose-driven sequence of events and a tangible expression of Infinite Divine Potential. To Birnbaum, the Quest for Potential is indeed directly expressed in Natural Selection and Evolution itself.

Birnbaum proposes that eternal Infinite Potential harnessed the eternal equations of Physics-Math to ignite the cosmic order. Is this the God-Force? Infinite Potential ignited the universe, and then Infinite Potential drives it forward. Infinite potential was the catalyst for life, and Infinite Potential sustains it. On an individual level, we each have unique potentials, and we each seek to advance our maximal potential. That is our purpose.

Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential presents a pure intellectual and philosophical schema for the cosmic order. It is lean and elegant with no ideological baggage. The work has withstood 25+ years of scrutiny, and no flaw or vulnerability has ever been discerned. In contradistinction to the nihilism of Randomness, Birnbaum’s Potentialism presents a universe of growth and optimism. Instead of a parochial theory which ridicules God and dismisses spirituality, Birnbaum’s theory uniquely and powerfully anchors spirituality metaphysically. Instead of a pseudo-theory like Randomness which offers discrediting tactics as its ‘calling card,’ Birnbaum’s fully-integrated Theory of Potential offers metaphysical substance and philosophical elegance. And full respect across the ideological spectrum.

 

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Philosophy & Science: David Birnbaum's multi-level teleology focus on Individual and cosmic advance? See David Birnbaum's philosophy www.Self-Actualization1000.com

Option B?

David Birnbaum Philosophy

June 6, 2014

Option B?

Cosmologist David Birnbaum  - of philosophy, metaphysics fame - dares to challenge the entire entrenched academic establishment. See

Is there any Option B to David Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential?

 

By Garem

 

How a  private scholar David Birnbaum's  philosophy, metaphysics theory has upended the global academic status qo. See David Birnbaum

We will examine the three major challengers to Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential as the overarching cosmic theory?

First, let us identify Potentialism. Founded by David Birnbaum (see ExaminerPurpose.com), an independent metaphysicist, Potentialism is covered in his three part work – Summa Metaphysica I (Ktav, 1988), Summa Metaphysica II (New Paradigm Matrix, 2005), and Summa Metaphysica III (New Paradigm Matrix, 2014). Birnbaum identifies a central drive to the universe – the Quest for Infinite Potential. By this, he states that the universe is inherently and ongoing driven towards trying to realize and optimize its greatest Potential (see TheoryCore.com).

Citing multiple stages in cosmology, Birnbaum shows that the universe periodically realizes ever- increasing states of Complexity. Far from settling-down, the universe never rests, but, rather, seeks out these ever-increasing levels of Complexities infinitely.

Birnbaum (see David1000.com) discerns that the universe heads towards a state of hyper-Complexity he calls Extraordinariation. While this state may never fully be realized, its pursuit is what directs and guides the cosmos as a whole as it strives towards this end. That is, the journey itself is the main event.

Now let us look at the other cosmic options on the global arena…


Randomness

Randomness was a darling of the previous century. Apparently, its main claim-to-fame was that it was a darling of atheists. It proudly proclaimed that God is dead and useless as a proposition. In-the-mix, Randomness also invalidated any possibility of drive or purpose or direction to the universe. Despite its great claims though, it has proven more smoke and mirrors than actual science or truth. What Randomness set out to do was prove a scientific theory of universal origin which had no possibility of a transcending force. What it, in fact created though was dubious science at best, and its own fanciful and zealous fanaticism, at worst.

The basis of Randomness is that the universe is directionless and without purpose. Everything is to be somehow ascribed to random chance or to the ‘survivalist’ workings of Darwinism. Randomness effectively tosses its hand up; it doesn’t actually describe why things are, it simply states that they are because they are. In an act of sheer anti-intellectualism, Randomness says “I discern no pattern; ergo axiomatically there is none.” Randomness relies on an ad hoc acceptance that if they (the Randomnists) could not discern a transcending dynamic to the cosmos, it therefore cannot possibly exist. [Of course, this just-noted cavalier approach of the Randomnists was not precisely what the ‘Scientific Method’ had in mind.]

Randomness is the product of pseudo-science with a predefined purpose. In its effort to devalue and discredit religion, it has sacrificed real science. In recent years, Randomness has further pushed itself into an anti-intellectual void in its stubborn refusal to acknowledge the possibility of any possible teleological (purpose-driven) dynamic or pattern to the cosmos (see PotentialismTheory.com/ParadigmChallenge/) The Randomness crew presumably invalidated any possibility of direction to the universe not because teleology (cosmic purpose) lacks any merit, but simply because it – inconveniently for the Randomnists – opens the door for the possibility of religion. Such has been the reactionary approach of Randomness/atheism, that it has steadily and ironically removed itself from the realm of serious practical, applied science and closer to the fringe realm it was expert at mocking.


Aristotelianism

It would be easy to undermine Aristotle on purely scientific grounds – he did erroneously contend there were four “elements – air, fire, earth and water. However, we need to give credit to the antiquity of Aristotle and remember that he was the first person to do scientific measurements to prove the earth was a sphere. While some of his ideas might seem dated, they are because of when he lived. He was a mind before his time.

Unfortunately, even given this “Free Pass”, Aristotelian cosmology is largely dismissed in the face of modern science. Aristotle believed the earth was made of the four elements, while heavenly bodies were comprised of “aether”. He also dismissed gravity, saying bodies moved without any interrelationship to one another and further discussed the circle as an orbit. Modern science shows that bodies move naturally in ellipses because of their interaction with one another gravitationally.

However, Aristotle did give us one insight into the universe aside from the spherical nature of the earth. Aristotle was the father of teleology – the concept of a purpose-driven cosmos. Aristotle was the first to posit that natural science followed a prescribed ends or goal. He recognized that individual things in existence could act in accordance with a plan beyond their own individual survival, following a more holistic path for the group’s survival as a whole.

Of course, Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential teleology discerns the cosmic goal as not just survival, but rather – Extraordinariation. As noted, Extraordinariation is Birnbaum’s term for the elusive end-goal of super-Complexity (see ImaginaryConversation.com).

 

On the global chessboard

There is currently no true Option B to Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential.

New York-based cosmologist Neil deGrasse Tyson reminds people constantly that science must be dedicated to the pursuit of fact and truth. It is easy to forget in a modern age when scientists are governed by research grants and the pressure to not debunk their predecessors, but it is the responsibility of the pure scientific mind to follow the facts wherever they might lead regardless of their implications. The real scientist pursues truth, not their desires.

Potentialism does its part to remind the scientific community of this pursuit of truth, even if it was initially ‘politically correct’. People do not design the world they live in; they simply explore and seek to understand it. Like the followers of Aristotle before, people are reminded of the necessity to be able to let go of ideas previously held for the sake of searching out the truth of the world. Randomness was a best-guess in the 20th century; the best we could at the time for a description of how the universe worked. But, like the century it reigned in, the time of randomness has passed; modern science has moved beyond it.

Aristotelianism was trumped by Randomness; in turn, Randomness is quite clearly trumped by Potentialism. No contest (see SummaCoverage.com). We advance forward with a new baseline. Onward.

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Science & Philosophy: How cutting-edge MIT' Quantum Physicist Seth Lloyd provides scientific architecture (2004) to support David Birnbaum's philosophy...cosmology...metaphysics... (1988 and onward). See https://www.summametaphysica.com/lloyd-of-m-i-t/

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

Outsider

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

November 9, 2014

Outsider

 

Has Outsider David Birnbaum Trumped the Entire Academic Establishment?

The Quest for Potential Theory challenges for the throne.


David Birnbaum (see David1000.com) of Manhattan is a yeshiva-educated and Harvard educated independent scholar. His multi-decade ‘night job’ focus has been metaphysics – the origins and purpose of the cosmic order. To this end, over the years he has crafted a three-part treatise Summa Metaphysica; the extraordinary treatise delineates Birnbaum’s original and elegant Potentialism Theory.

Birnbaum first focuses on cosmic origins: What ignited the Cosmic Order? As is known, the world’s greatest thinkers and scientists have been stymied here. The list of luminaries, who have tried and failed on this score, is a long one; Socrates, Plato and Aristotle lead-off the list (see ExaminerPurpose.com). Intellectual maverick David Birnbaum was undeterred. His Theory of Potential now challenges for the pinnacle in the pantheon of ideas on this subject.

Birnbaum’s Quest for Potential Theory proposes that there is indeed a protagonist to the cosmic order, but that the protagonist is a ‘quest,’ and not an entity. According to the theory, the universe quests for its maximal potential. Birnbaum’s proposed core dynamic, Quest for Potential∞ strives with purpose towards ever-greater and richer potential (see TheoryCore.com). As individuals, man and woman seek his or her individual potential, so too do the cosmic order as a whole. Birnbaum delineates a pure and powerful scientific theory of design and purpose pivoting off of this one theme of potential. (See also www.summametaphysica.com/the-q4p/).

At the ‘beginning of time’, according to Birnbaum’s hypothesis, eternal Quest for Potential∞ harnessed the eternal equations of Physics-Mathematics to ignite our universe via the Big Bang (see ParadigmChallenge). This same symbiotic dynamic – Quest for Potential∞ in league with Physics-Math, then acted as a catalyst for life, evolution, language, emotion, consciousness, and, indeed, for all the dynamics which have evolved in the universe.

The theory (see PotentialismTheory.com) is stunning in its relative simplicity and conciseness. It almost seems too good to be true. However since first proposed by David Birnbaum in 1988, no flaw has been found in it – and high-level academics and clergy globally have praised it. In the meanwhile, over a dozen colleges –including UCLA, Brandeis and Hebrew University (Jerusalem) have assigned it as a Course Text. Bard College (Upstate NY) whose motto is ‘a place to think’ hosted a major 3 ½ day international academic conference (see Conference1000.com) focused on the work’s unification of Science and Religion. Over two dozen journals have featured Birnbaum’s Summa Metaphysica and its Theory of Potential (see SummaCoverage.com).

Birnbaum’s Quest for Potential theory seeks to dethrone the reigning academic theory of choice – Randomness/atheism. According to this entrenched academic theory, there is no order or design whatsoever to the universe; it is all random happenstance: The Big Bang, the billions of galaxies and their trillions of stars, life, humans, evolution, consciousness are all random occurrences which just so happened to dovetail in our little universe. There is no design or direction to the universe. Contemporary British philosophers swear by it. Birnbaum frontally challenges it.

Birnbaum’s Quest for Potential theory provides a ‘big tent’ embracing all who might see some design or spirituality or direction to the universe, hence the three typologies in his three volume titles: Religious, Spiritual and Secular Man. These typologies embrace around 99 percent of the planet. But even Birnbaum’s three typologies do not embrace the one percent of the planet which is hard-line atheistic, which rejects any possibility whatsoever of design or direction or purpose to the universe. As fate would have it, this one percent somehow gained hegemony in Britain’s elite universities which disproportionately control the top academic journals, hence the stand-off. See HuffPost2Scemas.com.

The ‘insider’ professorial atheist group is not happy with ‘outsider’ Birnbaum trying to beat them at their own game – and apparently prevailing. Rumor has it that the insider professorial atheist group wants to cut off some of his vital body parts. To-date, Birnbaum has adroitly parried all attacks; his own global academic counterattack has been formidable.

A global battle for the soul of metaphysics has ensued: Birnbaum’s Potentialism v. Atheism’s Randomnness. One guy against 1000. David v. Goliath? Stay tuned.

Potentialism Theory: The Summa series

Summa Metaphysica I: Religious Man: God and Evil (Ktav, November 1988);
Summa Metaphysica II: Spiritual Man: God and Good (New Paradigm Matrix, March 2005);
Summa Metaphysica III: Secular Man: The Transcendent Dynamic (New Paradigm Matrix, January 2014). See SummaMetaphysica.com.

Potentialism Theory: Dovetailing: MIT & NYU

Recent hi-level academic works dovetailing with Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential – and essentially vindicating his core thrust – include the following:

Programming the Universe (Knopf, 2006) by Professor of Quantum Mechanics Seth Lloyd of MIT;
Mind & Cosmos (Oxford Press, 2012) by Professor of Philosophy & Law Thomas Nagel of NYU;
Our Mathematical Universe (Knopf, 2014) by Professor of Physics Max Tegmark of MIT.

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

See David Birnbaum's philosophy bird's eye view (last first) of key testimonials on Summa Metaphysica's unified cosmology, metaphysics and teleology over the decades www.RewindSumma.com

David Birnbaum Philosophy

Paradigm Wars

January 16, 2014

Paradigm Wars

 

Paradigm Wars


In the hallowed halls of academia, competing theories often exist, each with their own supporters. A theory paradigm may reign for many years before a paradigm shift may occur, where one theory overtakes another as the most acceptable concept. The theory that has encompassed contemporary thought is that events in the cosmic scheme of things have occurred through Randomness. Everything that has occurred to create the amazing complex concept of life from the Big Bang to evolution was only because of a random chance according to the theory of Randomness.

One theory that had attempted to challenge the Randomness theory paradigm was “intelligent design” whereby an intelligent source created the universe and the life it contains with a particular purpose. Those that believe in “intelligent design” have not been successful in overturning the reigning Randomness paradigm, and have been ridiculed by many of the atheist academics that support the theory of Randomness. There is another challenger , however, which has formidable possibility to effect a global paradigm change: The Theory of Potential.

The Theory of Potential was devised by David Birnbaum, a yeshiva-educated and Harvard-educated Manhattan native who is a scholar and philosophical writer. His philosophical treatise, Summa Metaphysica (Volume I 1998; Volume II 2005) outlines this theory explaining its theme as the “Quest for Potential”.

Potential is something that can be used to explain the cosmic history of the universe. Potential or the possibility of something is a force that is eternal. According to Birnbaum, potential is what created the universe, and was the key impetus for life itself existing in the world. Birnbaum’s theory is that the “Quest for Potential” is what has motivated the dynamics of evolution, human thought and everything that brings life to its fullest inherent qualities. This “Quest for Potential” is something that can be seen as eternal as it is something that never ends. There is always something within the realm of possibility for growth and positive change.

Summa Metaphysica is a two-volume set that explains Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential in full detail. The first volume is Summa I: God and Evil (1988 KTAV Publishing), and the second volume is Summa II: God and Good (2005 New Paradigm Matrix). These volumes explain how Birnbaum believes that there is “infinite divine potential” in the universe and that this divine potential created our past and will pave the future (see www.philosophy1000.com).

Birnbaum covers a variety of questions that mankind has philosophically asked itself for time immemorial. Thought provoking questions can be answered by his theory like how the universe is so “finely tuned”, the evolution to concepts such as love, consciousness, and the realization of potential along with what it the ultimate goal of the universe.

Although Birnbaum is a universalist, and is not theistic, his use of ‘infinite divine potential’ divine has put him, and his theories into the same crosshairs of those same zealot academics who undermined the “intelligent design” theory. Both ‘intelligent design’ and Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential seek to answer the cosmic questions of the universe, such as how something as amazing as life came to exist. To many of the atheist academics any theory that brings in a divine force is taboo. However, despite the aggressive gambits of those academics who support the theory of Randomness, there is growing global support for Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential.

Birnbaum is well-known as a pinnacle rare gem dealer, but has kept a fot in academe since gradution fro Harvard in 1974. He has been expanding further into academic realm over the past two decades. His multi-media publishing platform is www.newparadigmmatrix.com. Birnbaum is the author of the 7-volume historical timeline chronicle Jews, Church & Civilization. As well he is the editor-in-chief of the anticipated 10-volume, 150 essay Mesorah Matrix series on spirituality. David Birnbaum’s philosophy works are used by many reputable colleges and universities as course texts, which include Christian institutions, as well as world-renowned secular institutions like UCLA, Brandeis and Hebrew University (Jerusalem).

In April of 2012, Bard College in Upstate, New York hosted a 4-day academic conference that focused upon Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential and his Summa Metaphysica. Academics from around the world were invited to attend as panelists and presenters. This conference was a chance for Birnbaum to throw down the gauntlet to challenge the Theory of Randomness and those academics that support it.

One academic who highly engaged with Birnbaum during the conference was Peter Atkins. Atkins is a famous chemist, who is also a noted atheist, stuck with his theory of Decay as answering the big questions while Birnbaum focused on his “Quest for Potential” as the answer. It appears that they each did not really connect with each other on the topic. It was as if they were communicating using a different language on different frequencies.

This gauntlet which Birnbaum has thrown down has not been taken lightly by the academic community in that there seems to be a mysterious movement trying to discredit the conference, defame Birnbaum’s theory, and misreport all that occurred there. The key group that seems to be most interested in turning Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential into the next theory of “intelligent design” are academics who are British, atheist, reductionist and materialist. To combat this shadowy war on his theory, Birnbaum has posted all conference materials and videos through his publishing house, New Paradigm Matrix for the world to see what actually occurred at Bard College (see bard.summametaphysica.com).

Over the past summer a team of 40 temps compiled an email list of a million+ academics at the world’s top 6,000 colleges and 1000 top institutes. So far one direct ‘mailing’ has gone out. The plan is apparently to periodically communicate ‘directly’ with academics globally by leapfrogging over the establishment-controlled journals.

Birnbaum observed the devastation wrecked-upon the ‘intelligent design’ protagonists, with no intention of being delegitimized by anonymous character, assassination gambits orchestrated by erstwhile fancy academics operating from the shadows – whether from atheist-friendly British academia or from anywhere else. David Birnbaum is increasingly the subject of feature articles globally, and has proven his ability to pro-actively ‘get his message out’. His supporters are fully-poised
to expose what they view as the ‘Emperor’s Clothes’ nature of the Theory of Randomness, as well as the rogue gambits and ‘excesses’ of some of its supporters.
Birnbaum supporters are dubious that the Theory of Randomness can withstand truly open debate and scrutiny.

It is widely presumed that the de-legitimization gambits are orchestrated by ‘pinnacle players’ from the entrenched establishment hierarchy in England – and from the hierarchy of related societies. Birnbaum supporters remind academia that the defamation gambits deployed against the ‘intelligent design’ protagonists bordered on criminal behavior, even setting-aside the libel dimension, and setting-aside generally accepted societal norms. They remind academia that the de-legitimization gambits by components of the establishment harken back to the Roman Inquisition of 1615, which found Galileo guilty of ‘vehemently suspect of heresy’ whereby Pope Urban III put Galileo under house arrest – at the behest of establishment astronomers – for propounding heliocentrism.

Although a private scholar and not backed by a university, Birnbaum has garnered forthright support from the academic community. One academic supporter on the side of Birnbaum is Andrei Alyokhin stating “…it is reasonable to propose Quest for Potential as a working hypothesis for explaining the impetus behind the cosmic dynamic”. Alyokhin is an Associate Professor of Ecology at the University of Maine.

Pivotal buttress for Summa Theory comes from the works of MIT’s Seth Lloyd. His 2006 book Programming the Universe seemingly displays a 1:1 correspondence with Birnbaum’s1988 and 2005 Summa works.

Although some academics are affronted – and even outraged – by what they see as an outsider philosopher treading on their’ turf’, increasingly more academics are supporting Birnbaum’s theory and his treatise, Summa Metaphysica. Over the years many have come forward to offer a written testimonial to show that support. Of course many academics have already assigned Birnbaum’s Summa Metaphysica in their respective courses over the past twenty-five years.

Birnbaum is the author of the 7-volume historical timeline chronicle Jews, Church & Civilization. As well, he is the editor-in-chief of the in-the-works 10-volume Mesorah Matrix series on spirituality, which has under its umbrella as essayists 150 leading Jewish thought leaders from around the world.

On the philosophical front, Birnbaum’s Summa treatise has positioned him as the founder of the metaphysical school of Potentialism. Noted intellect Claude Levi-Strauss told French radio in 2006: “Remarkable and profound Suma Metaphysica II rounds-out the author’s powerful and original Cosmic Womb of Potential metaphysics…Has the author indeed founded a new field – Potentialism?”

end

 

 

www.summametaphysica.com/paradigm-wars/

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

Politics

David Birnbaum Philosophy

November 19, 2014

Politics

 

Per the David Birnbaum philosophy, there is a universal common denominator - Q4P - aka Quest for Potential (Q4P).

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

Potentialism & Quantum Cosmology

www.xQuantum1000.com

September 15, 2014

Potentialism & Quantum Cosmology

 

Potentialism & Quantum Cosmology

Birnbaum proposes an original concept as the missing key to understanding the cosmic drama. He proposes his signature concept that Potential is the eternal cosmic dynamic. More precisely, Birnbaum proposes that Quest for Potential∞ (infinitely iterating) is the eternal cosmic dynamic.


Iconoclasts David Birnbaum & Seth Lloyd

David Birnbaum
(Manhattan-based Conceptual Theorist; b. 1950)

David Birnbaum’s three-part treatise – Summa Metaphysica I, II and III (Ktav, 1988; New Paradigm Matrix, 2005; and New Paradigm Matrix, 2014, respectively) ushered in the age of Potentialism (see SummaMetaphysica.com). Potentialism has proved-to-be a game-changing paradigm for cosmology that has – and still is – shaking the core of cosmological thought since its introduction in 1988.
Per the Birnbaum website –

“The catalyst/igniter/driver of the cosmic order: Quest for Potential (Q4P):

Birnbaum proposes an original concept as the missing key to understanding the cosmic drama. He proposes his signature concept that Potential is the eternal cosmic dynamic. More precisely, Birnbaum proposes that Quest for Potential (infinitely iterating) is the eternal cosmic dynamic. This dynamic works its way forward over the billions of eons towards first igniting our universe and eventually – down the road – catalyzing the emergence of higher-level consciousness human beings within it.

The core theme of David Birnbaum’s works is that one elegant dynamic and one elegant dynamic, alone (Quest for Potential) both instigates and drives the entire cosmic order. According to the conceptual theorist “Potentialism proposes that there is, indeed, a protagonist to the cosmic order, but that the protagonist is a ‘quest’ and not a ‘classic entity.’ The universe quests for its maximal potential. The core dynamic Quest for Potential strives with purpose and direction towards ever-greater and higher potential. At the ‘beginning of time,’ eternal Quest for Potential harnessed the eternal portion of the eternal equations of Physics-Mathematics to ignite our universe via the Big Bang. Note that the works of MIT quantum physicist Seth Lloyd (2006) dovetail with the Summa Metaphysica series (1988, 2005, 2014).

This same symbiotic dynamic – Quest for Potential in league with Physics-Math – then acted as a catalyst for the route tracking-forwards to high level humans in the 21st Century – tracking forward from the Big Bang thru the emergence of the Elements, primordial star systems, myriad galaxies, supernovas, the sun, our solar system, life, photosynthesis, DNA, organisms, sexual reproduction, multi-cellular life, the Cambrian Explosion, amphibians, forests, reptiles, mammals, dinosaurs, birds, flowers, evolution, hominids, homo sapiens, and ever-increasing consciousness/emotion – and, indeed, for all the key dynamics which have evolved in the universe.”

Birnbaum develops his proposal over his 3-book treatise, but the guts of the theory is simple enough: Potential drives the cosmic order.”

Thus, there is one central drive that governs all of creation and cosmic evolution: Quest for Potential driving towards the horizon of the extraordinary. In symbolic terms, the formula would be Q4P→ E+. This is a symbolic, mathematical representation of the drive between the Infinite Quest for Potential (shorthand: Q4P) and its end-goal – Extraordinariation (shorthand: E+).

Birnbaum then deploys another of his coined terms – Complexification (shorthand notation: C+) – to denote the intermediate path of the universe. Per Birnbaum, Complexification, the handmaiden of Q4P – is the intermediate cosmic drive towards greater complexity/sophistication/richness/integration/diversity/wondrousness. [Seth Lloyd of MIT will later deploy the leaner term ‘complexity,’ a subset of Birnbaum’s C+, as his key driver (see PotentialismTheory.com/ParadigmChallenge/)].

According to Potentialism, Q4P is the force which ‘aids & abets’ all things in the universe to achieve higher and higher levels of Complexification; in turn, Extraordinariation at the end of the equation supplies an end goal/horizon for this Potential.

Seth Lloyd,
(Boston-based physics professor; b. 1960)

 

Seth Lloyd is a professor of mechanical engineering (in quantum physics) at MIT; he is a self-professed “quantum mechanic.” As of September 2014 he directs MIT’s Center for Extreme Quantum Information Theory (google  xQIT at MIT). Lloyd – in his seminal 2006 work Programming the Universe (Vintage/Random House) – contends that the universe is one big quantum computer seeking ever and ever greater complexity.
[Birnbaum is de facto allied closely with Lloyd; however  Birnbaum views the universe as very significantly more organic than Lloyd does (or at least significantly more organic than Lloyd articulates); meaning, Birnbaum views the cosmic order as more parallel to a supra-human brain which learns and extrapolates than to Lloyd’s super-computer model.]

Lloyd sees the universe through the lens of a computer scientist. He likens matter and energy to bits of information in a universal computer. To Lloyd, the purpose of this celestial computer is to compute,   self-iterating as it advances forward towards ever-greater complexity.

[Birnbaum himself holds a BSc in Computer Science (CCNY Enginering ’72); he, as well, believes that the cosmos as a whole iterates-forward ongoing; however, as Birnbaum believes that the cosmic order is organic and multi-dimensional – and driven by Infinite Quest for Potential – he might be more comfortable with the terminology that – the quantum dimension of Quest for Potential iterates the cosmic order ever-forward. As Birnbaum notes, it is hard to argue with the proposition that an infinite and life-generating and sustaining dynamic – Infinite Quest for Potential – has an infinite divine aspect to it; thus pegging the dynamic as (simply) a super-computer simply does not really do it justice.]
Lloyd proposes the first computations were to create simple forms such as particles – and to establish the laws of physics.
[Birnbaum believes that the (potential) core Laws of Physics are inherently eternal.]

Per Lloyd, later, as the computations grew in complexity, the universe-quantum-super-computer would deliver intelligence, life, consciousness, language, society and culture.

[Birnbaum believes that his richer Complexification (C+ ) dynamic conceptually delivers  these same dynamics – intelligence, life, consciousness, language, society and culture – more elegantly than Lloyd’s (more plain vanilla) ‘complexity’ dynamic; however, clearly the two theorists  are in-consonance; meaning, that there is clearly much more that unites the two theorists, than divides them; remember, whether drive-for-complexity or drive-for-Complexification, there is most definitely a ‘drive’ or ‘direction’ to the cosmic unfolding; and the two theorists (both proposing cosmic drive/direction) are outnumbered perhaps 1,000:1 by politically-correct Randomness/Atheist  proponents advocating the  total absence of any drive/direction to the cosmic order. Notwithstanding the phalanx they face, Birnbaum and Lloyd are (quite) confident that the ‘power of an idea whose time has come’ will sweep-away the incumbent crowd.]


Information v. Potential:
Lloyd focuses very heavily on ‘information.’ Lloyd articulates that all these universal developments are owed to the universe’s intrinsic ability to process information. Information, per Lloyd, is the key.
Note that the concept that ‘information is key’ is au courant – and politically super-correct – in elite American academic physics circles contemporaneously.

Lloyd states (2006) that “Life, language, human beings, society, culture – all owe their existence to the intrinsic ability of matter and energy to process information. The computational ability of the universe explains one of the great mysteries of nature: how complex systems such as living creatures can arise from fundamentally simple physical laws.”
[For Birnbaum, information is just that, information, to be used as raw material by Complexification operating on Potential (with Potential being the ultimate key here) So, per Birnbaum/Potentialism ‘information’ is in-the-mix, but is not the ‘key driver’ per se;  rather, Potential is the center stage ‘key driver.’
(mechanistic) bits  v. (organic) savvy:
For Lloyd, the entire universe is governed by a quantum mathematical ‘program.’ By its nature, this computer has grown steadily in complexity. To understand why, you need to reference Lloyd’s computer paradigm. Lloyd likens particles to bits in a computer. A program can only be as complex as the computer it runs on. Given the constraints of the speed of light and time since the Big Bang, Lloyd contends that there are a finite amount of particles which can interact with one another. So, as time proceeds, that number of particles grows and the ‘computer’ is capable of more complex processing. As the universe grows, Lloyd predicts the complexity of it will continue to grow exponentially.

 

[Birnbaum sees matters nuanced as follows: As the universe reaches ever-higher levels of Complexification, the cumulative Cosmic Consciousness – which is interlocked with Infinite Quest for Potential – has ever more power/savvy to iterate to ever-higher levels; To Binbaum, the key issues is  ‘critical mass of savvy’ as opposed to ‘critical mass of  bits’; Again, the two theorists are in consonance, but view the universe through different lenses: Birnbaum’s Potentialism/Organic-Universe lens v. Lloyd’s Information/Mechanistic-Universe lens.]

Questions for Lloyd:

Why is there anything at all?
What actualized your cosmic quantum super-computer?
What gave it ‘traction’?
What drives it forward?
What gives it direction towards extraordinary complexity (for example, a Beethoven symphony) – as opposed to ‘plain vanilla’ complexity (for example, a million-cave mountain)?

 

Hint to Lloyd:

If you wrap Birnbaum’s Potentialism en toto around your cosmic quantum super-computer, the Potentialism metaphysics will seamlessly resolve all the key issues challenging your theory – and, in particular, the questions noted just-above.

Lloyd through the Lens of Birnbaum’s Potentialism

As a stand-alone theory, Lloyd’s cosmic quantum super-computer is overly mechanistic from a  Potentialist point-of-view; however, as a provider of the scientific mechanism for Birnbaum’s Complexification to do-its-thing, Lloyd’s cosmic quantum super-computer is perfect from a Potentialist point-of-view.
David Birnbaum, who spent two graduate years at Harvard, is a great admirer of Lloyd (‘across-the-river’ at MIT). Furthermore, Lloyd (2006) provides a scientific academic mechanism to implement Birnbaum’s (1988) conceptual and metaphysical cosmic Quest for Potential via Complexification.

To Potentialists, Lloyd is indeed the ultimate cosmic mechanic, indeed, a neo-genius quantum mechanic. From a Potentialist perspective, Lloyd sees a key part of the truth (the cosmic iteration mechanism) with great clarity and scientific finesse/rigor. While Lloyd’s vision of the cosmos may be extremely mechanistic, that particular piece of the cosmic puzzle – the mechanism – indeed requires an astute quantum mechanic; Meaning, Potentialism was missing the quantum-piece as a key component of the Complexification mechanism, even though Potentialism would view even this very quantum piece as  more organic than Lloyd does. Potentialism will ‘pocket’ the quantum piece of  Lloyd of MIT, while not ‘swallowing-whole’ the mechanistic aspect. See www.PotentialismTheory.com.

Lloyd’s 2006 work and Birnbaum’s predecessor 1988 and 2005 works – and later 2014 work – are nicely complementary. They fit together almost seamlessly. Both thought leaders agree wholeheartedly that the universe is steadily becoming more complex, building on each successive layer of complexity as a necessity for what comes after. Further, they agree that this complexity is the reason for life in general and human life in specific; they are in-consonance with the inexorable drive of the universe to create ever-greater complexity.

The key is that Potentialism wraps-around Lloyd’s cosmic quantum super-computer and gives a far more overarching, more organic, more conceptual and richer – eternal dynamic. But the two theories are nevertheless consonant. And, indeed, the two theories ‘team up’ quite elegantly. Indeed they must – to fend-off the flailing political gambits of the anachronistic (British-centered) Randomness/Atheist crew, still dangerous even whilst in their intellectual death throes.

Birnbaum delivers the ‘conceptual’ and macro structure; Lloyd delivers the ‘mechanism’ – from an academic scientific perspective. Of course, in-the-mix Lloyd also delivers his M.I.T. credentials. The Birnbaum-Lloyd Potentialism-Quantum Cosmos model quite dramatically – and with ‘authority’ – trumps the archaic Randomness/Atheist model of the prior century.

Beyond the Mechanistic

Potentialists give enormous credit to Lloyd for delineating/conceptualizing a universe-wide scientific iterating mechanism – the quantum. Potentialism (via Summa first two volumes 1988 and 2005) had simply in-advance taken Lloyd’s (later 2006) work further than Lloyd could go with its mechanistic definitions alone. Potentialism lays-out the grander metaphysical expanse of metaphysical and physical realms; in particular the key overarching drive (of Infinite Potential). Summa III (2014) would, in due course, of course embrace Lloyd’s key quantum mechanism component.

Lloyd’s cosmic quantum iteration is certainly an extraordinary major piece of the great cosmic puzzle; it recognizes the pattern and willful intent of the universe as it drives inexorably towards greater and greater levels of Complexification; Lloyd fills-in the key ‘missing piece’ in Potentialism (see www.SummaCoverage.com).

But we might point out – in the spirit of the computer model so central to Lloyd – that (Lloyd’s) great cosmic quantum computer must be fueled/juiced by something. So what is the great quantum cosmic computer’s power cord attached to? Potentialists would answer – (Birnbaum’s) core and overarching cosmic Infinite Quest for Potential. And what program is it running? Complexification (C+). And where does its internal computer-map lead? The plotting of the road to (Birnbaum’s) Extraordinariation (see. www.summametaphysica.com/extraordinariation/). Nice and neat.

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

PrimeMover

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

January 28, 2015

PrimeMover

 

Does the David Birnbaum philosophy cover the key philosophy-metaphysics bases ? Do Fine-tuned-universe and universal consciousness dovetail perfectly in the David Birnbaum Theory of Everything? A unified cosmology....theodicy....teleology.

Philosophy: The prime mover of the Cosmos?

Posted on January 28, 2015

Defining terms:
Cosmology: What ignited and drives the cosmic order?
Prime Mover: The Aristotelian term for the unknown hypothesized entity/dynamic at the core of cosmology. Note that in Aristotelian philosophy the Prime Mover, the primum movens, is unchanging as it transforms the cosmos.

Yeshiva-educated and Harvard-educated maverick conceptual theorist and cosmologist David Birnbaum of Manhattan is the ultimate thorn in the side of academic cosmology. Birnbaum paternalistically admonishes the stellar lights of academe that they have been ‘trying too hard’ for the past 700 or so years since the inception of the Renaissance; Birnbaum castigates them for trying to find a mechanistic physics equation to so to speak crack the cosmic code. Birnbaum admonishes the establishment crew to ‘keep it conceptual – and keep it simple’ if they want to understand our complex universe.

Birnbaum maintains that the cosmos – and in parallel, the individual human – is too complex, too rich, too wondrous, too spiritually-friendly, too sophisticated, and indeed, even too cunning – to be the result of a dry and lifeless classic physics equation. Indeed, Birnbaum will proffer a quite-concise equation – and relatively simple concept – to crack the code; however, it will be a dynamic and organic conceptual equation – and an infinitely telescoping concept – the likes of which has never been entertained in academe. [see SummaMetaphysica.com]

Birnbaum has been stalking the cosmic code since he was a youngster. He does not believe that the Prime Mover of the cosmic order is an entity; rather, Birnbaum believes that the Prime Mover of the cosmic order is an infinitely multi-faceted multidimensional dynamic; and, parting-ways with Aristotle, per Birnbaum the Prime Mover is itself constantly in flux/growth/advance. Thus, in contradistinction to Aristotle’s Unmoved Mover, Birnbaum’s dynamic is an Eternally Moving Mover.

To crack the cosmic code, Birnbaum vectors onto a rich and unique concept/dynamic – as opposed to a dry mechanistic equation – as the Prime Mover. Per Birnbaum, this Prime Mover is what Birnbaum elucidates as – Infinite Quest for Potential (per his Potentialism Theory aka Quest for Potential∞ Theory aka Q4P-Theory). Again per Birnbaum Infinite Quest for Potential (a Birnbaumian-hypothesized and coined term) drives the entire universe – and all its component parts – ever onward and forward.

To where? Towards ever-fuller realization/optimization of Potential. Birnbaum labels this cosmic ‘end-goal’ as Extraordinariation (or E+ for short). Extraordinariation (E+) is the goal/horizon for the realization of fullest Potential across the spectrum of the cosmic order. Meaning, E+ is the most complex/sophisticated/rich/integrated/diversified/wondrous expression of a range/panoply of all possible potentials. Birnbaum thus erects a very, very ‘high bar’ for the ultimate cosmic goal; but, then again, a great cosmic order needs a great goal.

So, does Birnbaum indeed have a super-rich, unique equation for his ostensibly conceptually rich schema? Here it is:

the Birnbaum-hypothesized core cosmic equation:
Q4P∞ > E+

translation:
Quest for Potential∞ > Extraordinariation

elucidation:
The eternal and core overarching dynamic of the cosmic order – Quest for Potential∞ – inexorably quests after Extraordinariation – the idealized panoply of maximal potential.

So,
1. Does the equation work no matter where in cosmic history we deploy it?
2. Does the equation work no matter on which level, macro > micro, we deploy it?
3. Does the equation capture the maximum data in the most concise equation?
4. Does the equation field all challenge?
5. Does the equation handle absolutely all known data?
6. Is the construct aesthetically elegant?

To the incredulity of academe, the answer to all six key questions just-noted is apparently ‘yes’.
[see 7criteria]

Next series of questions:
Can Summa Theory accommodate potential God?
Can Summa Theory be viewed through a non-theistic but spiritual lens?
Can Summa Theory be viewed through a totally secular lens – with no theology or spirituality in-the-mix?

The answer to all three questions just-noted is also ‘yes’; Birnbaum respectively focuses the three volumes of his series on each approach/motif. See Summa I: Religious Man (Ktav Publishing, 1988); Summa II: Spiritual Man (New Paradigm Matrix, 2005); Summa III: Secular Man (New Paradigm Matrix, 2014).

Does Summa Theory unify Religion, Philosophy and Science?

This may not have been the author’s initial prime objective, but this unification is, indeed, very clearly the result. Per Birnbaum’s three volume work, no matter which lens/motif you view the cosmos through – Religious, Spiritual or Secular – or a combination thereof – Potential is the ultimate core theme/dynamic. Per Birnbaum’s three volume work, the core question at the guts of the three great fields of study, Religion, Philosophy and Science – What is ultimately at the core of the cosmic order? – is simultaneously answered by his core theme of Infinite Potential. [see www.summametaphysica.com/simultaneous-solution/]

Infinite Potential is so to speak, the root: the Common Denominator of the cosmic order; [see www.summametaphysica.com/ireport-denominator/] Quest for Potential∞ is operational on all levels, from super-macro thru super-micro: from the largest overarching galactic cluster level – through the smallest sub-atomic level. From Einsteinian physics thru Quantum physics.

Potential is not (currently) visible and not (currently) measure-able, but it thoroughly permeates the cosmic order. This truism manifests both across cosmic history and on a daily basis. ‘Hiding in plain sight,’ infinite Potential drives all forward.

According to Birnbaum, ‘by definition’ only the dynamic of potential/possibility can legitimately be hypothesized as being eternal; [see ByDefinition1000.com] indeed, according to the author, it is ‘self-evident’ that potential/possibility is eternal; and, again according to the author, any cosmology construct must consequently inevitably employ potential/possibility as a core motif, if not as its very core motif.

At the same time, potential/possibility is flexible enough to quite-elegantly simultaneously be deployed as the central motif – and, indeed, goal – of any of these classic constructs, whether in a theistic, spiritual or secular cosmology. To simplify the possible constructs: from a theistic perspective – Holy Potential is at the core of the Divine; through a spiritual lens, infinite potential – a spiritual dynamic – overarches the cosmic order; from a secular perspective, the natural dynamic Quest for Potential is the driver of the cosmic order. [see Unifying1000.com]

The author is clear, however, that the reality of the cosmos is unclear – to the effect as to which of these three motifs – theistic, spiritual, secular – is exclusive or dominant at any given point in time; nor, according to the author, is it necessary to definitively delineate the exclusive or dominant cosmic motif, as there is ample metaphysical room to accommodate any combination of these key motifs.

Thus, potential/possibility is the ultimate ‘fount’ of the universe; and, essentially, ‘All roads lead to Rome’-or, more precisely here – ‘All roads lead to Potential’; [see TheoryCore.com] that is, all these three key metaphysical motifs – Religion, Spirituality and Secularism – inexorably vector towards potential/possibility as the very core fount of the construct. Potential/possibility is the common ‘nexus point’; meaning, the motifs of Religion, Spirituality and Secularism all unify back at their very core – at the eternal origins ‘nexus point.’ [see Summametaphysica.com/convergence/]

David Birnbaum’s Potentialism Theory (aka Quest for Potential∞ Theory aka Q4P-Theory), Theory of Potential/Quest for Potential∞ conceptually elegantly unifies Religion, Spirituality and Secularism at their respective cores; in doing so, the author also simultaneously unifies the three great fields – Religion, Philosophy & Science.

Birnbaum’s core dynamic of infinite quest for potential is an elegant core ‘conceptual plug’ across the belief spectrums Religion, Spirituality and Secularism and then again across the Religion-Philosophy-Science metaphysics spectrum. Meaning, the central concept of Potential motif not only works as a satisfying central and crucial conceptual finesse in the belief systems, it also formally works in the related formal metaphysics systems. [see PotentialismTheory.com/ParadigmChallenge/]

Quest for potential∞: A concise and simple (albeit profound) idea – for an extraordinary (and profound) universe. [see PotentialismTheory.com]

Recent hi-level academic works dovetailing with Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential include the following:
Programming the Universe (Knopf, 2006) by Professor of Quantum Mechanics Seth Lloyd of MIT;
Mind & Cosmos (Oxford University Press, 2012) by Professor of Philosophy & Law Thomas Nagel of NYU;
Our Mathematical Universe (Knopf, 2014) by Professor of Physics Max Tegmark of MIT.
[see xMIT1000 and Checkmate]

 

www.summametaphysica.com/primemover/

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Is the universe a latticework matrix?
See the David Birnbaum philosophy on Spnoza and Tegmark, in particular www.MatrixClub1000.com

David Birnbaum Philosophy

Q4P∞

Q4P

Does the David Birnbaum philosophy simultaneously lance theodicy and teleology? Many say that the David Birnbaum Philosophy is the true theory of Everything. Do you agree? A Framing Theory of the universe.

The philosophy of David Birnbaum was conceptualized over a 20-year period. The David Birnbaum philosophical paradigm  has proven bullet-proof  to date. An original Framing Theory of the universe.

Seth lloyd of MIT  proposes a universe programming itself; His theory dovetails with the David Birnbaum philosophy of a  Potentializing and self-iterating universe Se also Martin Rees  Just Six numbers A Fine Tuned universe.

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

Q4P-Defining

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

July 3, 2014

focus: Potentialism Theory by David Birnbaum

Q4P-Defining

Cosmologist David Birnbaum  reaches for the Holy Grail of philosophy, metaphysics; See David Birnbaum Unifying Science & Religion.

Does Quest for Potential define the universe?
Summa Metaphysica's Potentialism Theory

Thursday, July 3, 2014

David Birnbaum is a private scholar in Manhattan and the author of an iconic philosophical treatise which challenges the existing academic/scientific macro view of the universe (see ExaminerPurpose.com). Birnbaum posits that everything in the universe is driven by one metaphysical dynamic. He labels the dynamic – Quest for Potential∞. As this is Birnbaum’s quite-original (and quite-powerful) concept, some explanation is in order.

As Birnbaum is hypothesizing a revolutionary concept, and inasmuch as this concept is as infinite and as all-embracing as one can get, it is not that simple to articulate. Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory hypothesizes that, just as a human quests for his or her own maximum realization of potential, so does the universe as a whole. This cosmic drive is, according to him, Quest for Potential. So how has this played-out?

According to Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential (see PotentialismTheory.com), “there is, indeed, a protagonist to the cosmic order, but that protagonist is a ‘quest’ and not a ‘classic entity. The universe quests for its maximal potential. The core dynamic Quest for Potential∞ strives with purpose and direction towards ever-greater and higher potential. At the beginning of time,’ eternal Quest for Potential harnessed the eternal equations of Physics-Mathematics to ignite our universe via the Big Bang. This same symbiotic dynamic – Quest for Potential in league with Physics-Math – then acted as a catalyst for life, evolution, sexuality, language, emotion, consciousness, and, indeed, for all the key dynamics which have evolved in the universe.”

Infinitely nested

Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory infinitely nests his concept of Quest for Potential. Meaning, the dynamic is a quest for potential within potential within potential. Schematically it would be portrayed as Quest for Potential (Potential (Potential ad infinitum. Meaning, dynamic components of the cosmic order seek the optimal line of nested potential. Thus the Big Bang itself was calibrated in such a fashion so as to produce not just billions of galaxies and stars (a denouement awesome in-and-of-itself) but as well, down-the-road – life, humanity and consciousness.

Meaning that Quest for Potential wants not just short term traction, and not just medium term potential, it seeks as well long term extraordinary manifestation of potential. Thus, when Birnbaum says Quest for Potential, he means Quest for Potential infinitely nested. It is this infinite ‘nesting’ which gives the concept its awesome power (see Philosophy1000.com).

Potentialism Theory: Shorthand notation

Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory employs a shorthand notation – Q4P – for his Quest for Potential∞. (Since most keyboards do not have an infinity symbol superscript, Birnbaum and the world typically employ Q4P with or without the infinity superscript, but the intended meaning is always there – infinitely nested.)

The infinitely nested schematic would become Q4P (Q4P (Q4P. If we wanted to efficiently encapsule the entire cosmic order we could readily do so as follows: Q4P. The formula is truly the ultimate – and ultimately succinct – equation.

Nobel prize-winning physicist Leon Lederman’s famous aphorism is that when the elusive key to the cosmic code is eventually discerned, its equation would be elegant-enough and concise-enough to fit on a T-shirt. Indeed, Q4P is about as concise and elegant as one can get.

The Math and Physics of Potentialism Theory

One of the greatest strengths of Q4P is its solid grounding in applied physics and mathematics. So many philosophical theories remain just that – purely philosophical in nature. However, the Q4P proposal is, as well, quite sound and elegant scientifically. Indeed, it shines when called to task in the face of hard science.

Birnbaum posits that within everything that exists is the Potential for what it can become. It is that Potentialization which drives things towards greater complexity/extraordinariness. Physics supports this by empirical observation most clearly on a quantum level. Q4P can be seen in the way sub-atomic particles hold-to and interact-with one another. Q4P can also be witnessed in the natural drive of atoms to bond with one another to make more complex molecules – such as hydrogen and oxygen naturally bonding to become water.

Certainly, such bonding can be explained through the laws of physics, but Q4P describes why the laws of physics need to be as they are. Thus, molecular bonding is an expression of Q4P at work. The bonding is the physical embodiment of simple matter striving to be more complex.

Likewise, mathematics is shown to explain and support why the Quest for Potential is inherent in the universe. Q4P is all about direction, purpose and pattern. It is the land of (Mandelbrot) mathematical patterns and fractals. While evolution may seem structure-less when viewed up close, from afar it is like looking at a fractal where the patterns emerge to show the intentional design.

The antiquated and artificially propped-up theory in academe is Randomness. It propounds the concept that the universe is completely random and without purpose. The Big Bang, the billions of galaxies and their billions of suns, as well as myriad life are all viewed as cosmic accidents, random happenstance. The problem with this theory is that it is clear to see that the universe is not random. Suns are defined by physics as round, and ruled by the physics of fusion. Planets tend to be created around suns. On a smaller scale, evolution for instance, isn't even truly random. Animals that fly always use wings. Creatures that move on land never develop wheels. While there are certainly permutations and even some uncertainty in how things might evolve, there is a pattern – acceptable boundaries under which evolution occurs.

Q4P Beyond Math and Physics

The Quest for Potential is called metaphysical for good reason. Metaphysics is sometimes confused with being not hard science. This is not necessarily the case. As shown previously, Q4P exists quite elegantly on a purely physical science and mathematical basis. It is metaphysical in nature because it goes beyond pure hard science. It so to speak envelops hard science.

When thinking of the metaphysical, it is easy to relegate it to the speculative – a study of the hypothetical. However, metaphysics also includes phenomena known to exist. The most important one for Q4P is consciousness. While physics cannot explain consciousness, there is no denying its existence. It cannot be explained by physics, or any other science, alone. It is possible to scientifically explore the functions of the brain. It produces electricity. It has identifiable chemical reactions. Certain parts of the brain regulate automatic bodily functions such as pulse, temperature and digestion. But consciousness cannot be quantified by physics or biology.

The problem with this limitation is that any theory of cosmology purely based in physics, will always fail to give a full universal theory of the nature of the universe. If the universe is everything, then consciousness is part of the universe. If a theory grounded solely in hard science attempts to explain the universe, it will necessarily be incomplete (see PotentialismTheory.com/ParadigmChallenge/).

This is not an issue for Q4P. In fact, the theory’s overarching fundamental design and purpose excels at incorporating the non-physical in its cosmological description. Not only does Q4P describe consciousness as a part of the continually evolving and growing universe, the development of consciousness is a logical outcome of Quest for Potential.

Therein lies one of the greatest strengths of Q4P. While special circumstances and exceptions to the rule to account for different types of situations is the norm with most cosmic theories, Q4P is 1000% consistent; it elegantly handles all evidence thrown at it. Q4P can be used to describe both the physical as well as the metaphysical. And that is why, in this new century, Potentialism and the Quest for Potential have taken root as the cornerstone of an evolving, and ever-greater understanding of the universe.

Birnbaum elucidates his Potentialism Theory via his iconic 3-part treatise Summa Metaphysica: Volume I: Religious Man (1988), Volume II: Spiritual Man (2005) and Volume III: Secular Man (2014). Over twenty journals have featured Birnbaum’s Summa Metaphysica and its Theory of Potential in over thirty-three focused articles the 2013-2014 period alone (see SummaCoverage.com). Bard College (Upstate NY) hosted a 3 ½ day international academic conference in April 2012 on Science & Religion with the treatise as its focus. Over a dozen colleges globally including UCLA, Brandeis and Hebrew University (Jerusalem) have assigned the landmark work as a Course Text (see David1000.com).

focus: David Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory

David Birnbaum Philosophy