Cosmic Tango

November 20, 2014

Cosmic Tango

 

The Cosmic Tango

The Artistry of Summa Metaphysica’s Potentialism Theory

Summa Metaphysica/Potentialism Theory is the creation of philosopher/metaphysicist/cosmologist David Birnbaum. To Manhattanite Birnbaum, different levels of the cosmic order mimic each other; indeed Birnbaum shows how detective-like we can unravel cosmic secrets by observing human or plant behavior and then extrapolate outward to the universe as-a-whole; and vice-versa.

Harvard and yeshiva-educated David Birnbaum sometimes speaks of the universe in the form of Yin/Yang lovers doing a cosmic tango. For scientists this can be off-putting. For the pure metaphysicist, intriguing.

Metaphysics was crafted within the realm of philosophy, not hard science. Certainly, metaphysics at its core incorporates (all) scientific principle as well as (all) data – as anyone crafting a theory of the universe, as a whole, needs to. But metaphysics is something much more. Metaphysics at its finest, deals not only with science, but also with consciousness, reason, art, morality, human existence et al. In modern terms, this latter cluster of metaphysics-related areas is often the turf of humanism. See Unifying1000.com.

David Birnbaum, the designer of the cosmological Potentialism Theory (aka Quest for Potential∞ Theory aka Q4P-Theory), as covered in his three-part Summa Metaphysica work, has accomplished what was once believed to be an unassailable task – the marrying of humanism and science and philosophy into one overarching theory of cosmology. See PotentialismTheory.com.

One dynamic central to Potentialism Theory is Push/Pull. From a humanistic perspective, the dynamic is easily understandable. To Eastern philosophy it is represented in the Yin and Yang dynamic. In Summa Metaphysica this duality is also represented as Achievement/Fulfillment…Active/Passive… Male/Female…Aggressive/Seductive.

David Birnbaum hypothesizes that the universe changes and grows because of an inherent need to achieve greater levels of complexity; Per Birnbaum, the universe vectors towards ever-greater complexity/sophistication/richness/integration/variety/wondrousness. See TheoryCore.com.

Q4P → E+. This is the core Potentialism Theory formula; it hypothesizes that the universe’s Infinite Quest for Potential (shorthand: Q4P) drives it ever-onwards towards the end goal of extraordinary potential, or in Birnbaum lexicon, Extraordinariation (E+). See also Glossary1000.com.

Q4P represents the Yang, the male, or the active drive of Potential, the spark that creates complexity. By contrast, E+ represents Extraordinariation, the end goal of the cosmos, the female, which ‘passively’ lures the active Q4P towards the desired goal.

Birnbaum describes these simultaneously, as well, in Western terms – the Push/Pull dynamic.

The Push – The Yang. The active drive towards complexity and, thus, Potential. The universal driving force of the universe. The neo-male.

The Pull – The Yin. It is the universal draw. It gives Push both meaning and destination. It is the inspiration that gives the universe purpose. The neo-female.

These two forces combine to drive the entirety of the universe in what Birnbaum calls the Cosmic Tango. And it is right that it should be described as a dance of lovers. From a humanistic perspective, the emotional coming together of humans is one of the highest orders of expression; and to David Birnbaum himself, it is a pinnacle of complexity.

But what is truly interesting is that this Cosmic Dance can be seen to replay itself over and over throughout the physical universe as well – be it on the micro or macro scale. Like all of Potentialism, it can be seen all around us. Take, for instance, the macro scale. Star systems and galaxies follow the Cosmic Dance. The planets encircle the sun, drawn by its inescapable gravity into a more complex formation. And the sun, in turn, spreads its warmth and light, nurturing the planets in return. In so doing the sun’s warmth and light gives the planets a chance at the ultimate known expression of complexity – human life. Similarly, our sun is cradled with the great pull of the Milky Way itself, without which our star would have long wandered away, alone into the void.

Likewise, on the micro scale, we see the balance of the proton and the electron within the atom and, more importantly and more complexly, the spiral of DNA – the universal blueprint of all life, be it plant or animal. The sugars spiral about one another in the long dance as chromosomes link between them, the complex product of their union. Thus we see the Cosmic Tango played over and over, both in the realm of the humanistic and the realm of the physical sciences – a universal, choreographed dance amongst all things in the universe as the dance of David Binbaum’s Potentialism Theory (aka Quest for Potential∞ Theory aka Q4P-Theory) plays itself onwards. See SummaCoverage.com.

Potentialism Theory: The Summa series

Summa Metaphysica I: Religious Man: God and Evil (Ktav, November 1988);
Summa Metaphysica II: Spiritual Man: God and Good (New Paradigm Matrix, March 2005);
Summa Metaphysica III: Secular Man: The Transcendent Dynamic (New Paradigm Matrix, January 2014).

Potentialism Theory: Dovetailing: MIT & NYU

Recent hi-level academic works dovetailing with Birnbaum's Theory of Potential include the following:

Programming the Universe (Knopf, 2006) by Professor of Quantum Mechanics Seth Lloyd of MIT;
Mind & Cosmos (Oxford Press, 2012) by Professor of Philosophy & Law Thomas Nagel of NYU;
Our Mathematical Universe (Knopf, 2014) by Professor of Physics Max Tegmark of MIT.
See xMIT1000

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

“Mr. Birnbaum has bravely entered into the vast fields of theodicy, an intellectual and spiritual terrain usually known for its complexity, difficulty and obscurity. GOD and EVIL represents a new, unflinching, yet reverential attempt to orient the events of history… With an evident intellectual daring, Birnbaum is not content to merely defend God…a fascinating, original and provocative reformulation of medieval Lurianic Kabbalah… It is a solution which will stimulate Jew and Christian alike.”

- Richard A. Cohen, Associate Professor of Philosophy, Shawnee State University, Portsmouth, OH

Cosmic T-Shirt

David Birnbaum Philosophy

August 21, 2014

Cosmic T-Shirt

 

The Cosmic T-Shirt

In 1989, Nobel Prize winning physicist Leon Lederman of Illinois wrote, “We hope to explain the entire universe in a simple formula you can put on your T-shirt.” Ironically enough, a year before Lederman published his observation, metaphysicist and independent scholar, David Birnbaum of Manhattan, had actually given this very formula. Birnbaum’s quite super-concise “T-Shirt formula?

Q4P

In his three part Summa Metaphysica series, Birnbaum laid out the most audacious, groundbreaking and, indeed, complete cosmological theory ever presented (see SummaMetaphysica.com). Not only did Summa I (1988) include a theory of cosmic evolution and design, it explicitly gave the formula to Lederman's to-be (1989) ‘T-Shirt Theory of Everything’ challenge. And just as Lederman, as well as such other notable minds as Albert Einstein had predicted, it was indeed as simple as expected and hoped- for. The Quest for Infinite Potential drives the universe forward. (See also www.summametaphysica.com/extraordinariation/) The formula was also graphically portrayed as Q4P (Q4P (Q4P ( or Quest for Potential ( Quest for Potential ( Quest for Potential ( For our T-shirt, let us simply call it Q4P. See also https://www.summametaphysica.com/theory-core/ That is, Quest for Potential (infinitely iterated) actually defines the cosmic order. A quarter of a century after Summa I was released by Ktav Publishing, Birnbaum’s Q4P remains unchallenged – and at the very pinnacle of cosmological theory (see SummaCoverage.com). What does this simple equation mean? What is this Quest for Infinite Potential? The theory is as simple as the formula itself: Infinite Potential seeks after ever-greater Infinite Potential. Birnbaum, when investigating the cosmological origins of the universe, was struck by one simple fact – everything in the universe was getting more complex – and, over time seemingly more sophisticated and extraordinary. Not just a few physical phenomena, but everything that was not inanimate. (see www.PotentialismTheory.com) Sometimes something is so pervasive, like the air we breathe, that we take it for granted and don't even see what is right before our very eyes. Such is the case with Potential. And it is literally everywhere. On our very planet we can see it in the evolution of plants and trees; we see it in the broader ecosystem looking at our planet as a whole with its myriad of environments and different microcosms of complex interactions. And it all came into existence on a ball of rock with a molten core. Birnbaum observes: Everything in the universe has a natural, inborn need to seek its own higher Complexification. Birnbaum defines Complexification (shorthand notation: C+ ) as the drive towards greater complexity/sophistication/richness/variety/wondrousness. Entities seek Complexification: Whether that be by morphing into an atom, a molecule, or an organism, the drive is Complexification. As well, entities can advance in C+ by reproducing – as sheer numbers increase the complexity of something as well. Complexification: Take, for instance, Birnbaum's description of human Complexification. On the surface, humanity is arguably the most complex creature we know. Among other profound abilities, humans can reason, dream, fashion tools, shape its own environment – and over many thousands of years, it has evolved to do so. But humanity also makes small changes in Complexification on an individual level every day. Broadly, personal complexity can be thought of as either intrinsic complexity or multiplicative complexity. Intrinsic is when a person grows in complexity through knowledge and experience, literally becoming more complex as they mature. Multiplicative complexity is expressed by humanity's ability to procreate. In short, when two people create a third, the sum of their Potential complexity rises. This holds true, no less, when observing things on a more universal scale. Galaxies are intrinsically more complex when they form and the stars they form in turn increase the multiplicative complexity of the galaxy itself. What's more is that the original, simple formula needs no bylaws to account for exceptions and no modification to work, as is, in describing anything in the universe – even the abstract. Yes, the abstract. Potentialism is used to describe such concepts as thoughts, feelings, love, altruism, beauty, art and emotion as easily as it describes the physical and natural world around us. And for a true metaphysicist, that is a necessary part of cosmology. If you truly seek to understand the entirety of the universe, there is no way to say “well, the physical universe at least.” The universe is everything – from the solar winds that wash over our planet to the notes of a symphony. If you've experienced, then it is part of the universe – no exceptions. But Potentialism doesn't even bat an eye, the same cosmic formula just as apt at explaining morals as molecules. See ParadigmChallenge. In fact, you'll find the universal drive towards greater complexity – enroute towards ever-more-extraordinary Potential – universal and applicable to anything. That is what makes it, in fact, such a powerful Theory of Everything. Quest for Potential (infinitely iterating) drives the cosmos forward via Complexification towards Extraordinariation. The shorthand for Quest for Potential (infinitely iterating) is Q4P; the shorthand for Complexification is C+; the shorthand for Extraordinariation is E+. So, our new SuperLaw of the cosmic order is Q4P > C+ > E+. The super-shorthand defining the cosmos remains simply Q4P. Thus, Quest for Potential is both the hidden – and ubiquitous – drive of the universe; it has been hiding in plain sight waiting to be uncovered./discerned/discovered. And there is only one thing that makes this discovery even better – it actually does fit on a T-Shirt with plenty of room to spare.

Q4P

No flaw has been discerned in Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential since first introduced to the world via Summa I (Ktav Publishing, 1988). Summa Metaphysica was the featured and prime focus of a 3+ day international academic conference hosted by Bard College (Upstate NY, March 2012). See www.Conference1000.com). A Course Text at over a dozen colleges (see SummaCourseText ), Summa Metaphysica has been the focus of over fifty feature articles in 2013-2014 alone. Recent hi-level academic works dovetailing with Birnbaum's Theory of Potential include the following: Programming the Universe (Knopf, 2006) by Professor of Quantum Mechanics Seth Lloyd of MIT; Mind & Cosmos (Oxford Press, 2012) by Professor of Philosophy & Law Thomas Nagel of NYU; Our Mathematical Universe (Knopf, 2014) by Professor of Physics Max Tegmark of MIT

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

“I have read GOD and EVIL with interest and profit. It is a searching, knowledgeable, and readable attempt to confront the fundamental moral problem of theodicy with its most severe contemporary test, that of the Holocaust.”

- Berel Lang, Professor of Philosophy and Humanistic Studies, Chairman, Department of Philosophy, State University of New York at Albany

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

C+ > QJ

August 21, 2014

C+ > QJ

Philosopher David Birnbaum's  paradigm-changing simultaneous solution de facto cracks the cosmic code.

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum’s philosophy treatise:

 

“David Birnbaum has woven together motifs from both rationalists and mystics…absorbing and impressive.”

– David Shatz, Professor of Philosophy, Yeshiva University, New York, NY

de Chardin

June 20, 2014

focus: Potentialism Theory by David Birnbaum

de Chardin

logical_logo

de Chardin's Omega Point v. Birnbaum's E+

Posted by Admin On June 20th, 2014 09:42 PM |Philosophy

On Tuesday April 17, 2014, the second afternoon of the Bard College (Upstate, NY) 4-day international academic conference on David Birnbaum’s Summa Metaphysica series (see www.SummaMetaphysica.com), as a group all the conference Panelists visited the nearby gravesite by the Hudson River of iconic religious philosopher Teilhard de Chardin. At the gravesite, Birnbaum himself read a poem in honor of the iconic thinker.

The French Jesuit Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (1881–1955) published, in 1950 (the year Birnbaum was born) his cosmological theory which he called the Law of Complexity/Consciousness. de Chardin postulates that the universe can only move towards greater Complexity and consciousness if it is being guided to do so by a Supreme being which pulls the universe onward towards Complexity. He states that this Omega Point, which he loosely identifies as Christ/God, is necessary to exist as the supreme state of Complexity, already existing and doing so outside the bounds of the universe, and He is the cause of the universe's moving towards greater Complexity.

Independent metaphysicist, David Birnbaum (see ExaminerPurpose.com), released a theory which sounds similar on the surface. Potentialism was crafted in his three part treatise – Summa Metaphysica I: Religious Man (Ktav, 1988), Summa Metaphysica II: Spiritual Man (New Paradigm Matrix, 2005), and Summa Metaphysica III: Secular Man (New Paradigm Matrix, 2014). In it, Birnbaum describes a universal formula Q4P → E+. He states that the universe is inherently designed to move forward towards greater and greater Complexity/Sophistication, towards what he calls Extraordinariation – an end-goal state of infinite Complexity/Sophistication. You'd think, at cursory glance, these two theories are just minor variations on a central theme. You would be terribly incorrect. Let us analyze de Chardin's Omega Point in comparison to Birnbaum's Extraordinariation (see TheoryCore.com).

Basic tenets of the Omega Point:

Omega: It must already exist, this infinitely Complex state, as it draws the universe like a cart behind it towards infinite Complexity.

Potentialism: From a Potentialist perspective – if something is infinitely Complex.... it's done. Game over. You win. There is no point to a universe where the Super-Complex already exists. The infinitely Complex is a destination, not a starting point; it would make Complexity redundant and meaningless.

Omega: The Omega Point must be conscious. It cannot be an abstract concept. According to de Chardin, consciousness is a higher form of Complexity than physical Complexity and humans, as the first and only to achieve higher consciousness, represent the ultimate form of consciousness outside of God. Thus, it follows to de Chardin that God would be a higher form of Complexity in man's image. Or, as de Chardin puts it a bit more humbly, man is a much less Complex form in God's image. But either way you look at it, de Chardin is basically saying God has to be like us to be better than us.

Potentialism: Potentialists would look at de Chardin’s theory as man's bid for universal supremacy and “specialness”. However, Potentialists have a much more holistic view of the universe. Thought and matter are not comparable, though they can affect one another. Potentialists usually shy away from ranking them in order of importance when they exist in different realms. Inside their own realm, it is obvious there are higher orders. Molecules are higher order compared to atoms and emotion is higher ranking than instinct. But comparing cognition to nuclear fusion is a bit like comparing the number 5 to the color blue – it's hard to get a meaningful conclusion from the exercise. Likewise, Potentialists approach the subject of God (1) more inclusively to all sciences and (2) with more humility. Potentialists do not pretend to know the nature of the drive towards Complexity/Sophistication, what they refer to as the Quest for Infinite Potential. They can see its working on a day to day basis, but its nature is not self-evident. It could as easily be an abstract force as a conscious creator. More to the point though, Potentialists, while acknowledging there could be a conscious hand driving the universe, do not take to conjecturing the nature of such a necessarily unknowable force.

Omega: The Omega Point must exist at the creation of the universe. It cannot be a result of the universe. To de Chardin, the Omega Point is necessary to pre-exist to pull the universe towards Complexity. As such, he says his Super-Complex being must exist outside the universe, attracting it towards him through Complexity.

Potentialism: To Potentialists, the universe is driven by the Quest for Potential towards Complexity/Sophistication. Complexity/Sophistication is a result, not a cause in the everyday mechanics of the universe. Unlike de Chardin, a divinity in the Potentialist universe is allowed to reside there. de Chardin creates some hypothetical dimension where his Omega Point must be isolated-to while the universe, for some reason, is eternally playing catch up to it. Potentialists place the driving universal force, organically, front and center – permeating the universe itself (see www.PotentialismTheory.com).

Omega: The Omega Point must be free from the limitations of time and space, completely and autonomous - free from the confines of the physical universe. Again, to de Chardin, this requires his Omega Point to exist outside the universe.

Potentialism: A few points here. One, de Chardin speaks repeatedly about this “place” outside the universe. Potentialism is not religion, it is science (allowing space for religion). Potentialists shy from using the word “universe” cavalierly. If they say universe, they mean universe. Everything. No exceptions to try and make a theory work. The concept of an omnipotent being with a self-imposed ban from the universe is an oxymoron to Potentialists. Any higher being must be able to exist within the framework of the universe. Indeed, it is a requirement. Something cannot be omnipresent and absent at the same time. Further, to quote one Potentialist: “God doesn't need hacks.” Linear time is something humans are slaves to. There is no reason God cannot exist at all times at once. Further, by definition, one would think it is necessary to look at something supremely Omnipresent and Omniscient as existing throughout all time-space. As to the hack comment, anything Omniscient would never need to break the laws of time and space. If one knows the outcome of all events and makes all laws themselves, then the universe should be exactly what is needed to be to accommodate any wish they have.

Omega: The Omega Point is irreversible – it must happen and cannot be undone.

Potentialism: This may be the only point Potentialism and the Omega Point agree upon – the unstoppable force of increasing Complexity/Sophistication.

As you can see, Potentialism and de Chardin share very little in common short of their observation: that the universe is unstoppably increasing in Complexity/Sophistication. But de Chardin sees this as a pulling effect from some Super-Complex, human-like divinity existing in another dimension pulling the universe along to, in effect, catch up with his own Complexity.

While Potentialists do not all agree with a conscious divinity, they all do agree that there is certainly a force at work. But, Potentialists stick to what can be witnessed and proven. They identify a teleological type force which necessitates the universe's continued increase in Complexity/Sophistication. It is at least semi-cognitive on some level, but not necessarily on an organic level like humans. Ironically, this leaves Potentialism at home with the agnostic, the spiritualist and the religious.

For the agnostic, Potentialiosm just identifies a force, which can most certainly be seen as simply another law of the natural world. For the religious, it identifies a necessary force to creation and whether you ascribe it intelligence – well, that's just as a matter of faith as it should be to the truly religious.

To the religious Potentialist, Potentialism describes a universe at home with the divine, where the divine permeates every aspect of the cosmos from the tones of a symphony to an electron's dance around its nucleus. They do not banish the divine to a lonely existence outside the universe of His own creation. To Potentialists, God is not just the end-goal Super-Complex, it is also the divine spark of creation – the Quest for the Infinitely Complex. A Potentialist would be the first to point out that God proclaiming himself the Omega was only half the story. Revelations says, “I am Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End, the First and the Last”. The beginning is the Quest towards the Infinitely Complex. The end is Extraordinariation – the expression of infinite Complexity, or as Potentialists usually put it more succinctly: Q4P → E+.

Notwithstanding all the clear differences between de Chardin’s Omega Point and Birnbaum’s E+, one cannot underestimate the extraordinary ‘common ground’ of the two. Both propose a teleological (direction-oriented) universe. Both clearly allow ‘space’ for Religion, to put it mildly. Both confidently unify Science, Philosophy and Spirituality. Both iconoclasts open extraordinary realms and windows into the cosmic order. While springing from different religious upbringings, Jesuit and Orthodox Jewish respectively, both are kindred-spirit apex player intellectual revolutionaries (see www.SummaCoverage.com).

focus: David Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

“…an intellectually engaging work. Birnbaum’s relentless inquiry and probing approach to the issue of theodicy offer the reader an adventure of ideas… I recommend the book highly.”

- Rabbi William E. Kaufman, Temple Beth El, Fall River, MA, Visiting Professor of Philosophy, Rhode Island College, Providence, RI, Author, Contemporary Jewish Philosophies

Dice / Einstein

November 9, 2014

Dice / Einstein

 

 

 

 

God does not play dice with the universe

 

The Holy Grail of Physics boils down to a Unifying Theory?
Iconoclasts Albert Einstein & David Birnbaum

 

Potentialism Theory: metaphysics rescues physics

Quantum physics would haunt Albert Einstein his entire life. The science he helped discover disturbed him intensely. Once quoted as saying “God doesn’t play dice with the universe,” he was forced to look at seemingly strong evidence to the contrary from this field. He actually went to his grave still trying to challenge quantum theory.

It would be over 30 years later, in 1988, when David Birnbaum released the first of his three-part Summa Metaphysica series. What Birnbaum uncovered was a line-of-attack which Einstein would readily embrace – that, indeed, the Quantum is not so random after all. While Einstein thought the cure to universal Randomness lay in disproving Quantum theory, in truth, the answer lay in embracing Quantum theory but better discerning its core thrust; and its core thrust is not random at all.

Essentially Birnbaum’s Potentialism Theory lays the groundwork for a teleological (direction-driven) Quantum physics model; Potentialism thus de facto ‘rescues’ Einsteinian physics from having to co-exist with a randomness Quantum physics model.

Like Einstein before him, Birnbaum refused to accept what Quantum theory seemed to be telling us; which was that the universe was fundamentally a random place, empty of any aspect of direction. Birnbaum distinguishes a clear path and purpose to the seeming chaos of the Quantum physical universe.

Potentialism Theory: unifying physics

Indeed, Birnbaum’s Potentialism Theory, as an aside from cracking the greater cosmic code, also happens – as a by-the-way – to unify (micro-level) Planck’s Quantum physics (Quantum Field Theory) with (macro-level) Einsteinian gravitational physic (General Relativity).

This little by-the-way is what academic physics signifies (somewhat grandiosely) as The Theory of Everything. They have been searching for this ‘unification theory’ for some time. See https://www.summametaphysica.com/einstein-summa/.

Birnbaum wryly notes that many pinnacle academic physicists swear by Randomness and then beat-their-breasts that they cannot unify the two great theories of physics. Maybe their little assumption – of Randomness – is dead wrong.

Regarding academic physics’ Theory of Everything

As alluded to above, the academic physics ‘Theory of Everything’ quest is really just a quest for a unifying theory of the two salient (micro and macro) physics paradigms noted; the pursuit ultimately has ‘limited’ goals; The Summa Metaphysica Theory of Potential, on the other hand, is indeed a true theory of everything – the scope of the soft and hard sciences – but its author holds-back and steers-clear of labelling it as-such. See TTOE1000.com.

Potentialism Theory: overarching?

To Birnbaum, the cosmos and our universe run on his discerned principle of Quest for Potential. Everything that exists seeks out its own greatest/optimal Potential. A seed strives to be a tree, a couple strives to procreate, and a cloud deep in the void seeks to become a star and planets.

This transcendent and all-encompassing energy across the universe is pervasive; it can often be missed, even though it plays out all around us in an endless, universal and infinite dance. It is literally ‘hiding in plain sight’ – as Birnbaum had speculated from the get-go. See SummaMetaphysica.com.

Nuts & bolts

Birnbaum differentiates several key core cosmic dynamics – all inter-related with Potential; he discerns them, fleshes them out, labels them, and gives each a shorthand notation. By condensing his metaphysics, he enables us to get-our-arms around it – and more readily discuss it.

Q4P (Quest for Potential)

Potentialism describes the eternal and infinite Quest for Potential as the central, cosmic drive of the universe. See TheoryCore.com. This Q4P, as he calls it for short, first ignites the universe, and then gives direction/drive to the entire universe. See also www.summametaphysica.com/the-q4p/.

C+ (Complexification)

On the intermediate level Q4P inherently strives towards greater and greater levels of what Birnbaum coins as Complexification (shorthand: C+) the drive for ever-greater complexity, sophistication, richness, integration, diversity, wondrousness. Therefore, C+ is so to speak the handmaiden of Q4P, its ‘enforcer.’

[Note that, incidentally for maverick Birnbaum, American scientists Lloyd and Tegmark, both of MIT, will release books in 2006 (Programming the Universe) and 2014 (Our Mathematical Universe) respectively, which present compatible-with-each-other scientific-mathematical mechanisms for C+. These works are further ‘nails in the coffin for the British-touted Randomness construct – and provide a quite-powerful academic scientific reinforcement for Summa’s metaphysics.]

E+ (Extraordiariation)

In turn, this C+ drives the universe towards what Birnbaum coins as Extraordinariation (shorthand: E+). Extraordinariation is a goal-horizon of sublime and utter super-Complexification – both in form and quality.

In turn, Extraordinariation would include, but not be limited to, ultimate –
grandeur, elegance, beauty, symmetry, fulfillment, consciousness, harmony, artistry, symphony, spirituality, perfection, humanitarianism, romancing, love…parenting, meaning, altruism and mercy …

Extraordinariation level is never actually reached, nor is it intended-to; it is rather, a cosmic-goal-horizon to be quested-after. This eternal ‘quest’ is a key dynamic energising the Cosmic Order, in general, and life, in particular. See www.summametaphysica.com/extraordinariation/.

The three key inter-related components Q4P, C+ and E+; in turn combine into Birnbaum’s proposed SuperLaw of Potentialism:

The SuperLaw of Potentialism Theory

Q4P > C+ > E+ or Quest for Potential > Complexification > Extraordinariation

According to Birnbaum, the universe’s world-wide and infinite drive towards its own Potential can be witnessed in the day-to-day increases in Complexification of everything in the universe. We can witness the theory at-work in the (historical) formation of atoms, then molecules, as well as in the birth of the stars and galaxies – and, indeed, in the birth and inevitable development of life forms on our very own planet.

Potentialism Theory: resolving a conundrum

In Quantum mechanics the classic conundrum is the now classic model that the observation of a photon (an electromagnetic particle of energy) affects its possible trajectory; this has stumped modern science; however, in reality what they are witnessing is the potential for the photon to go with either route – being resolved by observation.

To Potentialists, everything in the universe has an infinite amount of outcomes, but they exist within a finite scope of possibilities. Through experience and observation, just like in quantum mechanical models, choices will affect what seemingly random path may be taken. But from a philosophical perspective, while these choices are infinite in possibilities, they are not directionless – they are all ultimately aimed towards one direction – Extraordinariation.

More on Extraordinariation

Extraordinariation is a Potentialist concept. E+ represents a perfect state of super-complexity – a state of countless complexity. It is not so much a destination as a goal-horizon. Indeed, to Potentialists, if E+ were to be achieved, the universe may very well have concluded itself. But this possibly infinitely long destination is what guides the universe to continually seek higher and higher levels of super-complexity.

Birnbaum calls this inherent motivation towards super-complexity the Quest for Infinite Potential, and it is the basis for his iconic cosmological formula: Q4P > C+ > E+. In one simple formula, Birnbaum lays out the first truism of the universe, giving the cypher that unlocks the encrypted truth of both the universe’s origin and destination.

The metaphysicist and the physicist

Yeshiva-educated and Harvard-educated Conceptual Theorist Birnbaum presumably did not envision himself as a to-be saviour of Einstein; Birnbaum would be the first to tell you that such was not on his to-do list; but in fact that is the case which has emerged.

God? Both Einstein and Birnbaum maintain that God is a possibility.

Chance? Both Einstein and Birnbaum believe that obviously ‘chance’ plays a large part in the universe, but is not the core motif. See www.Summametaphysica.com/huff-post-uk/.

Direction to the universe? Both Einstein and Birnbaum believe in the affirmative. See also Dovetailing1000.com.

So, does God play dice with the universe? Both Einstein and Birnbaum say ‘no way.’

Two key cosmic formulas? Birnbaum’s metaphysical-formula Q4P > C+ > E+ wrapping around Einstein’s physical-formula e = mc2

It’s a wrap.

 

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

“…a masterpiece for our times…”

- Benjamin Blech, Rabbi, Young Israel of Oceanside, Author, “Theodicy” tape series, New York, NY

Digital Journal

February 11, 2014

focus: Potentialism Theory by David Birnbaum

Digital Journal

www.RewindSumma.com

dg_logo_top

Op-Ed: A scientific finesse of the God question
Does Potentialism Theory unify Science & Religion?

By Scott Sawitz

A debate has raged for several thousand years pivoting over the following (real) issue and (false) assumption: If the universe and the human body are indeed ‘designed,’ does that not prove (supernatural) Creationism?

The atheistic/scientific community says NO DESIGN, ergo no (supernatural) Designer (God). The polar-opposite Creationist community says YES DESIGN, ergo (our supernatural) Creationism (and God).

Enter metaphysicist and conceptual theorist David Birnbaum: There is YES DESIGN, but the designer is (scientific) Infinite Quest for Potential in league with the equations of Physics-Math. Cannot get more pro-science than that. However, Birnbaum then takes matters to an interesting universality: This eternal overarching dynamic of Infinite Potential may or may not evolve into classic God. Matters can metaphysically be read either way.

Meaning, hitherto, notwithstanding compelling evidence, the ‘entrenched orthodox’ atheistic academic community has adamantly presented a ‘united front’ coming down squarely and aggressively against considering any design in nature, presumably to short-circuit any argument for Creationism. However, their zealousness in challenging DESIGN is predicated upon a false premise.

Birnbaum shows that, contrary to the popular-wisdom assumption, DESIGN is not only scientific, it is radically more scientific than the random chaos championed by the ‘entrenched orthodoxy’ of the British academic atheist hierarchy. To the Randomness/atheist advocates, all is random and meaningless. Birnbaum feels that history will not be overly kind to their unstructured and scientifically dubious Theory of No Theory.

Albert Einstein, in his book The World As I See It, stated that the harmony of natural law "reveals an intelligence of such superiority that, compared with it, all the systematic thinking and acting of human beings is an utterly insignificant reflection."

In a letter to a child who asked if scientists pray, Einstein wrote "Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe – a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble” (January 24, 1936; Einstein Archive 42-601).

The Big Questions: Classic metaphysics questions have remain unanswered for millennia: Is there an eternal dynamic? What was the catalyst for the cosmos? Why does anything exist?  How/why did Life emerge? What is our purpose? New scientific questions have been added to the list:  What ignited the Big Bang? What is the essence and drive of Evolution? What was the catalyst for emotion, consciousness?  Birnbaum daringly offers an elegant simultaneous solution (to all of the above) which has tantalized the world.

Metaphysics was the discipline of the classic Greeks: Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. But  they were not able to come up with convincing answers which would stand the test of time; nor were the great Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Eastern or secular philosophers able to do so. So since civilization began 7,000 years ago, these questions – both the old and the new – have hitherto remained unanswered.

The field of metaphysics almost disappeared from the radar as a formal discipline subsequent to the posthumous publication of Dutch philosopher Baruch Spinoza’s treatise Ethics following his death in 1687. In the ensuing 300+ years, no one has put forward a comprehensive theory or tract which has gained sustained traction to gain international attention and a significant academic foothold – until Messr. Birnbaum’s Summa Metaphysica alighted ‘center stage’ in 2012-2013.

Potentialism Theory: David Birnbaum of New York began looking at this ultimate puzzle as a 10 year old in 1960. Poking-around and consulting whatever ‘sources of knowledge’ he could gently harass, Birnbaum focused on three key fields which he was directly exposed to: religion, metaphysics and astrophysics. He was acutely aware of the parallel shortcoming in all three for explaining cosmic origins. He first came up with his solution in 1982 and formalized his theory in the 1988 volume I of his to-be 3-volume treatise.

Birnbaum employed a somewhat unique approach to unraveling the inter-related Big Questions. He made several key assumptions, which were to prove crucial. He felt that the solution was (a) probably not only ‘hiding in plain sight,’ but that it was also (b) relatively simple, and (c) infinite.

Regarding (a) his reasoning was that that a dynamic powerful-enough to extricate reality from the cosmic void, was probably a pervasive theme – and hence, pretty much in full view. Regarding (b) his reasoning was that only a ’simple’ dynamic could be eternal, and as regards (c) his reasoning was that only an infinite concept could get us from infinity to the present.

Meaning, that the key to the cosmic code was not some obscure mathematical formula. And meaning that as a consequence he could deal with the code-breaking part-time, sort-of as a hobby. He conjectured that the correct solution to any one problem, should be the solution to at least several of the other key Big Questions. Thus, the proof that he had hit upon the correct ‘solution’ would not lie in abstruse physics, but rather in its apparent simultaneity.

Birnbaum’s main resource for information was initially two elementary school Yeshiva of Forest Hills classmates Sherwin and Alan, each of whom seemed to know everything there was to know about science. However, they consistently deflected his Big Questions with a shrug. That was to be his experience with the scientific community in general in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and 2000s. Up until 2012 when Bard College hosted its now-famous conference fully-focused on his landmark work (see below).

According to Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential, eternal Quest for Potential harnesses the eternal equations of Physics-Math to ignite the cosmic order. See his 16 point outline for a step-by-step articulation.  Birnbaum proposes that his theory can be viewed respectively by Religious Man, Spiritual Man and Secular Man. Hence, his three-volume treatise.

A brief wedge into Religious Man would show him potentially viewing the Creator as the God of Potential. See Book of Exodus at the Burning Bush saga, where the Creator identifies himself as Eheyeh asher Eheyeh. Birnbaum translates that as I Will Be That Which I Will Be – meaning, according to Birnbaum, I am the God of Potential.

Birnbaum promotes an original concept as the key to understanding the cosmos. His concept of Infinite Potential as the eternal cosmic force, suggests that this dynamic worked its way forward over the eons and ignited our universe, which ultimately led to the materialization of humans.

Developed in 3-volume Summa Metaphysica, Potentialism Theory can be explained quite succinctly as well: Potential drives the universe. Infinite Quest for Potential is the “prime mover” of life; it lies where science, philosophy and spirituality meet. Flexible enough to include all typologies of mankind - religious, spiritual and secular man – Infinite Potential can be defined differently by each:
For religious man, it is the core of classic God.
For spiritual man, it is the spirit and drive of the cosmic order.
For secular man, it is the cosmic mechanism.

Birnbaum develops his Potentialism Theory schema for the three typologies of mankind across his three volumes: Summa Metaphysica I: Religious Man: God and Evil (Ktav Publishing 1988); Summa Metaphysica II: Spiritual Man:God and Good (New Paradigm Matrix 2005); and finally Summa Metaphysica III:  Secular Man: The Transcendent Dynamic (New Paradigm Matrix 2014).

Although his theory can be simply stated in one word “Potential,” Birnnbaum crafted Summa Metaphysica to attempt “get his arms around” an infinite universe – and the key  metaphysics problems therein. The treatise has been used as a course text at universities worldwide including UCLA, Brandeis and Hebrew University (Jerusalem).  Birnbaum’s Potentialism Theory was the subject of a 4-day international academic conference in April 2012 at Bard College in Upstate NY, which ultimately ignited a global storm.

Scientist Andrei Alyokhin, Associate professor of Biology and Ecology at the University of Maine wrote in November 2012 “Deeply rooted in Biblical tradition, yet providing a modern and original approach to answering millennia-old questions, Summa represents a bold attempt to formulate a unifying concept of the universe….It is reasonable to propose Summa’s Quest for Potential as a working hypothesis for explaining the impetus behind the cosmic dynamic.”

Yale philosopher of religion and noted metaphysics authority Louis Dupré (1988) wrote of Summa I “an original, and, in this reader’s opinion, a very promising point of view…the author gathers a philosophically coherent and, in the end, a highly modern insight…a unified metaphysics….” British journalist Oliver Burkeman (2013), directly echoing the iconic French scientist and thought leader Claude Levi-Straus (2006), has hailed Summa as “remarkable and profound.”

To hear Birnbaum himself speak about his theory, check out Summa “focus tapes”. No flaw – scientific or otherwise - has been found in Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential since Ktav Publishing released Volume I of Summa in 1988. And, after 7,000 years of  both formal and informal discussion and debate on these issues, there is no competing integrated theory on the global chessboard.

www.RewindSumma.com

focus: David Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

Note that David Birnbaum & family are long-standing members of - and attend - Modern Orthodox synagogue.

Note, as well,  that David Birnbaum is the Editor-in-Chief of the Mesorah Matrix series (see  Mesorah1000.com).

 

“God and Evil …is sure to be regarded as a major contribution to the Jewish study of theodicy…the first major theological study that systematically confronts this problem directly and in detail… All subsequent work on the presence of evil in this world will have to take seriously this book and the cogent and direct analysis it brings to the topic.”

- Peter J. Haas, Associate Professor of Jewish Literature and Thought, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

Drob Intro

www.DrobIntro.com

Drob Intro

 

See also David Birnbaum  Potentialism Theory, Quest for Potential (Q4P), Theory of Everything,
The David Birnbaum metaphysics/cosmology unifies physics, spirituality and philosophy.
Iconoclast David Birnbaum's Philosophy rivets. His paradigm-changing simultaneous solution Cosmic Womb of Potential metaphysics de facto cracks the cosmic code.

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum’s philosophy treatise:

 

“This book accomplishes a remarkable feature. It manages to provide a theodicy within the framework of traditional Jewish belief and philosophy and not only a theodicy which works, but which does so with intellectual rigor and emotional satisfaction. The intellectual honesty and emotional sensitivity are apparent on every page.”

– Professor David M. Goldenberg, Associate Director, Annenberg Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA

Einstein-Birnbaum

October 27, 2014

Einstein-Birnbaum

Iconic Paradigm Challenges:

Albert Einstein’s Relativity Theory &
David Birnbaum’s Potentialism Theory

 

By Guest

 

einstein_picHow Messrs. Albert Einstein and David Birnbaum fended-off reactionary European academia Conceptual revolutions are often brutal; succeeding generations are gifted the new theory, but the progenitor of the new theory oftentimes faced significant personal and professional hostility initially launching the new theory.

Here's a historical instance which establishment academe would just as soon forget. When Einstein won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921, his Theory of Relativity was deliberately omitted from the prize citation; other components of his work were cited; some members of the Nobel Prize committee objected to publicly connecting the new theory with the historic prize. Despite his groundbreaking work on Relativity, Einstein was actually often ridiculed by a segment of European academia that simply wasn't ready or smart enough to listen to him; and this segment was certainly not willing to accept his shaking the scientific foundations of the entire field of physics.

How bad was the reaction at the time? In 1931, an entire book A Hundred Authors Against Einstein was released. In it, for instance, one author Hans Reichenbach described Einstein's work as naive and “unintentionally funny.” The hundred authors simply could not accept the new physics world which Einstein’s physics had revealed. The authors calculated, however erringly, that they were more likely to advance in the academic pantheon by ridiculing Einstein, than by getting on-board with the new physics.

However, physics is a science. So, regardless of our opinions, physics inevitably moves on truthfully whether we like it or not. It may unfold haltingly, even generations later, but eventually it unfolds. So, despite push-back, eventually Relativity did win out – because it was correct.

Such has been the current case with David Birnbaum’s Theory of Potential. Birnbaum, an independent scholar and metaphysicist, stepped forward to illuminate an equally – and possibly even greater – game-changing thunderbolt of science/metaphysics – the cosmological theory of Potentialism; once again, ahead of the curve; once again, an extraordinary theory facing a virulent rear-guard push-back from a small but vocal segment of European academia.

Birnbaum comes to us as a visionary with his Quest for Potential Theory. His proposition – ensconced in his iconic treatise about the universe – is something at once compelling and incisively explanatory; as per Einstein, Birnbaum’s work is contrary to politically-correct, intellectually fuzzy European academic-scientific thought. And therein lies the real issue.

To the European academic hierarchy and their hard-line Atheist support group, the universe is random and absent any overarching drive; to the Randomness/Atheists, everything we know exists by random chance happenstance; that ‘everything’ would include among other matters – the Big Bang, the galaxies, supernovas and solar systems; that ‘everything’ would include the 100+ Elements, photosynthesis, life, consciousness, humanity, love et al. Meaning that ‘everything’ is, according to the Randomness/Atheist group, merely a matter of random luck and chance.

Birnbaum, taking an almost polar opposite view, sees the totality of the universe as anything but random; to Birnbaum, chance, however important part it plays, is ultimately an ancillary show to the universe; it is not the ‘main event.’ Per Birnbaum, the universe unerringly – from time immemorial – inexorably seeks after its maximal potential. This overarching drive towards maximal potential – Infinite Quest for Potential - permeates the entire Cosmic Order. And, crucially, this drive is natural, not supernatural.

And that is the very core root of the conflict. European academics had preached for well over a hundred years, that the only alternative to their Randomness/Atheism was a supernatural Creationist God. But Birnbaum has demonstrated that the alternative to the dubious zealot Randomness/Atheist view of a chaotic universe doomed to decay, is not necessarily the supernatural. Rather, the clear alternative is a universe governed by a natural dynamic – Birnbaum’s hypothesized Infinite Quest for Potential.

Per the theory, this core cosmic dynamic may or may not have evolved into God per se. The core theory works independent of possible Creationist God. Thus, the core Randomness/Atheist debating tactic – either our ‘natural universe of disorder/chaos’ or your ‘supernatural Creationist universe of order’ – is fatally undermined by Birnbaum’s ‘Quest for Infinite Potential natural universe of order.’ Academic science and metaphysics/philosophy had simply missed the core dynamic of the Cosmic Order; it was, after all, ‘hiding in plain sight’ all along (including for the 7,000 years of civilization). As Birnbaum notes “The metaphysicists erringly looked for a classic Protagonist, while the physicists were simply ‘trying too hard’ – too focused on their sub-atomic particles and physics equations; both key groups missed the obvious. See TheoryCore.com.

Like Einstein before him, Birnbaum initially faced a small but vocal coterie of reactionary European academic resistance. But, like his predecessor, Birnbaum has remained steadfast and has proven unstoppable. Birnbaum’s theory is expounded via his three-part treatise – Summa Metaphysica.

Like Einstein before him, Birnbaum has been the subject, as well, of gratuitous and virulent ad homenim European-based attacks – disinformation included – from narrow corners of academe. But despite this, Birnbaum has steadfastly maintained his course in the name of academia and truth.

Metaphysicists stand in a particularly demanding place where they are required to have expertise in a myriad of fields – philosophy, physics, math, astrophysics, biology – as well as cognitive function and emotion. So, it is of little surprise that Birnbaum himself is not shocked by the fear and inertia of segments of the European academic community. As well, that same establishment is heavily-invested in the old theory.
So, does this reactionary push-back affect the truth in any way? It can certainly slow down the advance of truth – sometimes very significantly; typically, however, virulence aimed at a correct theory cannot stop it – if at least some traction is achieved by the new theory at the get-go. Europe was the cradle of the Renaissance; unfortunately it intermittently shows severe resistance to new truth when that truth doesn’t comport to the status quo. Such is the case with Potentialism. But, like Einstein before him, Birnbaum has committed himself to the long haul; and he remains resolute. Indeed, in response to the gratuitous attacks, both Einstein and Birnbaum upped-the-ante by generating additional academic work enhancing their respective theories. Eventually, the carping crowd was exposed for being on the wrong side of history.

Academics who have spent their lives defending the past theories of such cosmologies as Randomness, will likely never be won over. They simply have too much invested in these failed theories – whether through their books, articles, seminars or awards – to accept a new truth when it arrives on their doorstep; and certainly not a revolutionary newly-discerned truth. As legendary physicist Max Planck noted – veteran physicists do not yield to new truths so readily; they simply have too much invested in the status quo. In the case of Randomness Theory there another twist – as these academics are aided & abetted in the media by non-academic (religious zealot) Atheism believers.

The 1962 classic The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas Kuhn (University of Chicago Press) analyzes the oftentimes almost intractable resistance by existing science to new science. In the case of Birnbaum, he proposes not only new science, but a complete and revolutionary new metaphysics – fully wrapping-around exiting science. It is virtually a ‘10’ on the academic Richter Scale, an ultimate earthquake in scientific/academic thought. Indeed, to the extent that Summa Metaphysica’s Theory of Potential is disseminated, the world will simply no longer be the same.

Birnbaum will remain unfazed by European inflexibility though. Indeed, a vanguard of elite American scientists and thought leaders have recently emerged, whose recent works dovetail with the Birnbaum metaphysics (see section titled ‘Dovetailing” below). Taking notes from his predecessor in the General Relativity field, Birnbaum remains true to his theory; he is unbowed and unapologetic.

Such is the foundation of all modern science. Europe may posture as the heart of academia and scientific thought, but for over a hundred years, it has de facto calcified debate over cosmology. Fortunately, Birnbaum, like Einstein before him, understands this, and stands steadfast and defiant.

 

Potentialism Theory: The Summa series:

Summa Metaphysica I: Religious Man: God and Evil (Ktav, 1988);
Summa Metaphysica II: Spiritual Man: God and Good (New Paradigm Matrix, 2005);
Summa Metaphysica III: Secular Man: The Transcendent Dynamic (New Paradigm Matrix, 2014).
See SummaMetaphysica.com.
Over fifty thousand volumes of Summa I, II or II are in circulation.

 

Potentialism Theory: Context

Summa Metaphysica has been –
# the prime focus of a major international academic conference (see Conference1000.com)
# a Course Text at over a dozen colleges (see SummaCourseText.com)
# the focus of over 100 feature articles (see SummaCoverage.com)

 

Potentialism Theory: Dovetailing

Birnbaum draws his core support from elite American academe: Harvard, Yale, and NYU. He is at the cutting-edge of Renaissance II, spearheaded by confident and cutting-edge American Thought Leaders.

Recent hi-level academic works dovetailing with Birnbaum's Theory of Potential (see PotentialismTheory.com) include the following:

Programming the Universe (Knopf, 2006) by Professor of Quantum Mechanics Seth Lloyd of MIT;
Mind & Cosmos (Oxford Press, 2012) by Professor of Philosophy & Law Thomas Nagel of NYU;
Our Mathematical Universe (Knopf, 2014) by Professor of Physics Max Tegmark of MIT.

 

Potentialism Theory: Counterattack

See The Closing of the Scientific Mind by Gelernter of Yale, Commentary Magazine, January 2014. See SelectedRelated.com for the Gelernter piece plus related articles. All counter-attack against the nihilistic (and academically abusive) Randomness/Atheistic crew.

 

Potentialism Theory: Paradigm Challenge

Via his revolutionary true theory of everything (see TTOE1000.com ), Birnbaum has instigated a global paradigm challenge (see ParadigmChallenge.com). Literally all fields of study are impacted.

David Birnbaum himself is known globally, as well, as the author or the editor-in-chief of several important series on history and spirituality. His New Paradigm Matrix platform has over 180 Thought Leaders from around the globe under its aegis.

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

“God and Evil is an engaging and thoughtful work. It brings a fresh new approach to an old problem, utilizing classical Jewish and other sources in a dynamic, compelling and creative manner…. As a person who has spent many years dealing with the problem of theodicy, I must confess that I approached your book with skepticism. I thought that all that could be said, had been said. Nevertheless, I was surprised at what I learned from your work. Thank you for writing it.”

- Dr. Byron L. Sherwin, Vice-President for Academic Affairs, Spertus College of Judaica, Chicago, IL

Einstein & Summa

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

www.Einstein1000.com

April 12, 2014

Einstein & Summa

 

Wrapping Around Einstein


The Holy Grail of physics has always been a Unifying Theory - unifying Macro & Micro physics. (Macro-level) Relativity and (Micro-level) Quantum Mechanics leave theorists with a seemingly intractable paradox – they are both demonstrably true, yet they contradict each other. The great scientific mystery has been how two seemingly contradictory - albeit theoretically and empirically provable theories - can be reconciled.

Metaphysical theorist and philosopher David Birnbaum may be closer than imaginable to an answer. In his three-part treatise, Summa Metaphysica I: Religious Man (1988), II: Spiritual Man (2005), and III: Secular Man (2014). [Summa IV is reportedly on the drawing board]

Birnbaum, aligned with Aristotle, presents a teleologically based (direction-based) model of the cosmic order in sharp contrast to the entrenched Theory of Randomness. His Summa Metaphysica  proposes  a conceptual revolution, challenging entrenched Randomness Theory. Conceptually, Birnbaum posits and defends that the universe is not driven by random-chance and decay, but rather by an intrinsic drive to advance and enhance. Without falling into a religious argument over the nature of the force of Potentialism, Birnbaum’s Quest for Infinite Potential proposes and describes a driver & direction (Quest for Infinite Potential) for the cosmic order.

At its most basic, Potential is the inherent force in the universe that drives creation – matter, energy, life and evolution. It is, per Birnbaum, omnipresent and eternal. Birnbaum's Potentialism (first volume 1988) is a well-defended and vetted theory of cosmology. But the true test of the strength of a philosophical cosmological theory is whether it can stand in the face of the spectrum of physics and reality - which it has to date.

Put simply, the competing ‘theory’ of Randomness does not. It throws in the ‘intellectual towel’ before even attempting to explain physical phenomenon, (somewhat bizarrely) claiming that the entire universe is random, pointless and unknowable.  By contrast, Potentialism not only accepts the myriad challenges, it welcomes them.

Einstein and Planck

Here is the fundamental issue. Einstein is the creator of the (Macro Physics) General Theory of Relativity and the (Micro Physics) Special Theory of Relativity. Relativity shows the interrelation of time and space. The Special Theory describes a geometrically flat space-time universe. This 'flat universe' is where Max Planck’s Quantum Mechanics Theory lives. The basic issue with this is that the universe which Special Theory describes is not our universe. The Special Theory universe is a place where gravity doesn’t exist. To be clear, Quantum Mechanics Theory was crafted in a universe that is not ours. Special Theory was only crafted as an intermediary step as Einstein was working on the (Macro Physics) General Theory of Relativity, which incorporates Einstein’s work on space-time with the Classical Mechanical Model of physics and Newtonian Physics, which governs gravity.

The (Macro Physics) General Theory does its job. It marries space, time and gravity into one mathematical model. That Quantum Theory was born as a derivative of the Special Model was unexpected. Here lies the problem though – Quantum Theory only works in a space-time model with a flat geometry. The addition of the Newtonian physics of gravity creates bends and depressions in space-time. These depressions are not possible in Quantum Theory. At the same time, they are not possible to remove in (Macro Physics) General Relativity.

How much stranger can this get? (Micro Physics) Quantum Physics works. Not only can it describe the smallest particles of our universe, much of modern technology is based on its principles. Turning on a modern radio is proof of Quantum Mechanics. But (Macro Physics) General Relativity works as well. Time-space warping has conclusively been proven as well. Is this a mathematical mistake? Have two of the greatest minds in the history of science in reality both failed in their most important works?

Physicists say conclusively no. Hence, their exhaustive search for a Unifying Theory or what is called the (physics) Theory of Everything (ToE). What is missing for a (physics) ToE is the glue that melds these two models, or universes, together. If not a hard mathematical model, as it seems it is beyond math to explain, then a philosophical model. According to Planck and Einstein, the ToE would have to be simple and universal.

Infinite Potential

Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory Potentialism already describes such a unifying force. Birnbaum audaciously proposed (1988) that one ‘simple and universal’ dynamic -- the Quest for Infinite Potential -- drives creation and the laws of the universe. In the 26 years to date subsequent to Summa I no flaw has been discerned in the hypothesis.  Included in Potentialism theory is the understanding that the universe of tangible reality (our universe) emerged from a grander cosmos of non-tangible reality (eternal Infinite Potential).

According to conceptual theorist Birnbaum, Quest for Infinite Potential (operating in a grander cosmic context of non-tangible reality) harnessed the eternal equations of Physics-Math to ignite our (reality) universe (via the Big Bang). In turn this symbiotic dynamic – Infinite Potential in concert with the equations – is the catalyst for biogenesis, life as we know it, evolution and consciousness: et-al The elusive (five+ millenia) ‘designer’ is thus discerned.

Now how does this apply to ToE (Theory of Everything)? According to Potentialism Theory, all things in the entirety of the cosmic order are simultaneously (a) what it ‘is’ and (b) the potential for what it ‘can be.’ That is, for instance, a person both (a) exists and (b) within that person exists the potential for their legacy and the ramifications of their legacy; included in their legacy are there own and achievements of all the children and on and on – hence the term, Infinite Potential.

Birnbaum offers a schematic: Quest for Potential ( Quest for Potential ( Quest for Potential.
He suggests the shorthand notation Q4P, thus the schematic would be: Q4P (Q4P (Q4P
To be able to display the formula (and the universe) succinctly:  Q4P

How does this conceptualization apply to physics?

Let’s take a classical example from Quantum Mechanics. Say we take a piece of lead and cut two slits in it and release photons towards it. Any individual photon might go through either slit. And photons are waves, so after they pass through the slits, they will collide and interfere with one another. Common sense so far. However, according to the Quantum Mechanical model, any individual photon passes through BOTH slits. This has been proven to be fact. In tests, an individual photon has been shown to interfere with itself as it simultaneously passes through both slits.

As disturbing as this phenomenon might sound, Potentialism doesn’t just explain this, it predicts it. On a quantum, sub-atomic level, it is easier to witness Potentiality by inference. As predicted, and indeed explained by Birnbaum, the photon has the Potential to travel through either slit, hence in the quantum dimension it ‘exists’ passing through both until it necessarily is realized.

Potentiality and Actuality

To put things more simply, (micro-level) Quantum Mechanics describes the Potentiality of objects, (macro-level) Relativity describes their Actuality. In physics, a quanta is the minimal amount of something for something to happen. For instance, how much energy must be applied to make an electron move from one state of excitement to another? There is no in-between on the quantum level. It will be at excitement state #1 until enough energy is applied for it to exist at excitement state #2.

In Potentiality terms, Quantum Mechanics describes what must happen for something to exist. This is Potentiality at its most basic. Something has the Potential to exist – whether it does or doesn’t. Some Quantum Mechanical phenomena simply give us an inferential glimpse at the states of Possibility. When they are observed directly and necessitated, they are actualized.

So why does Quantum Mechanics only recognize flat time-space and not curved time-space? Quantum Mechanics is in a threshold position between the quasi-metaphysical realm of Special Relativity, and the reality-realm of expressed Potentiality. General Relativity, in turn, is an actuality. It represents what the current universe is.

More than Physics

There is a veil between what ‘can be’ (the quasi-metaphysical) and what already ‘is’ (reality). Physicists are uncomfortable with this and understandably so. However, Potentialism is not only comfortable with this, it daringly predicts it (in rudimentary form back in 1988). Mathematical physics can only explain one part of the universe – what ‘is’ (reality). When it comes to what ‘can be’ – universal Potential (metaphysical and quasi-metaphysical) – it falls apart. Something more is needed.

The metaphysics of Potentialism leaves room for different universal rules for, respectively, Quantum Mechanics and Relativity. Saying that they must mathematically always agree limits Infinite Potential. It is necessary to understand that Quantum Mechanics physics is at the threshold between Potentiality and the Realization of the cosmological order; Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory is the bridge between the two.

Among other triumphs, Potentialism Theory resolves the hitherto intractable paradox noted at the very top of this piece. Thus although tucked into just one brief formula (Q4P∞ > C+ > E+), for lack of a more humble term, Birnbaum's Potentialism Theory is the hitherto elusive Theory of Everything.

 

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

“David Birnbaum’s engrossing book God and Evil is a highly informed discussion of the perennial problem of theodicy. Steeped in Jewish learning, it is a strikingly original midrash on a very difficult theme, written with a boldness and passion, and is a pleasure to read…”

- David Winston, Professor of Hellenistic and Judaic Studies, Graduate Theological Union, Berkeley, CA

David Birnbaum Philosophy

Embedded Infinities

David Birnbaum Metaphysics

February 5, 2015

Embedded Infinities

 

Playing with Infinity

Three Key Embedded Infinities in Birnbaum’s signature concept – Quest for Potential?

David Birnbaum of Manhattan is the founder of Potentialism Theory (see PotentialiamTheory.com). The centerpiece of the theory is that one dynamic – and one dynamic alone – drives the Cosmic Order. The dynamic is hypothesized to be Quest for Potential?. But exactly what is the infinity sign referring to?

Birnbaum knew that his theory would meet with resistance from the establishment academic community, and Birnbaum has hinted on more than one occasion that he did not want ‘to overload’ the doyens of Oxford and Cambridge.

On the surface, it would appear that the signature dynamic of Conceptual Theorist David Birnbaum’s

(proposed) core cosmic dynamic has just one infinity embedded in it. But does it not have at least three? On the basis of Birnbaum’s writings it would seem that we, indeed, have three:

  1. Eternally infinite Quest for Potential
  2. Infinitely nested Quest for Potential
  3. Infinitely telescoping-forward in time Quest for Potential

Some terminology:

# The ‘cosmos’ refers to everything-everything, metaphysical and physical. The ‘universe’ refers to our own, known post-Big Bang physical universe.

# Q4P is the shorthand notation for Quest for Potential?. See www.summametaphysica.com/logical-science/. Many keyboards do not have a readily-available infinity sign; therefore, for ease of communication the infinity sign has been dropped in the shorthand notation (but many deploy the infinity sign in the shorthand notation as well, in any event).

1) Eternally infinite – tracking-backwards – Quest for Potential

Physics:  Physics can describe the universe back to the Big Bang. Interestingly though, physics as we know it today, may have been ‘re-born’ at the Big Bang. Particle, quantum, Newtonian and relativity physics were most probably  de facto at a minimum ‘re-invented’ during those first initial moments.

Thus, it may be incorrect to state dogmatically that physics as we know it today is necessarily 100% eternal; indeed, it is a subject of debate. Birnbaum’s position is that primordial physics is eternal and was marshaled by Q4P to ignite the Cosmic Order; per metaphysicist Birnbaum, physics may or may not have morphed over time.

Potential: Hypothesized Potential is the only truly infinite and eternal cosmic dynamic. It is both ruler of the current cosmic order and the associated rules of physics. While the physics of the universe may have evolved, the eternally infinite eternal origin has not. Q4P is the “fire” which spawned universal creation and still governs it today – the universe’s quest to reach for its own ultimate Potential. See ExaminerPurpose.com.

Indeed, Quest for Potential? is eternally infinite. Hence, Infinity #1 of the formula.

2) Infinitely nested Quest for Potential

Multi-generations of humans: The straightforward example of nesting is grandparent > parent > child > grandchild ad infinitum (hopefully); all the potentials down the road are nested within the grandparent.

Beyond humans: The cosmic dynamic is infinitely nested. One of the most interesting conceptualizations of Potentialism is that Potential must not only be pervasive throughout the cosmos but also infinitely nested from the micro to macro scale. See TTOE1000.com. Further Potentialism is defined in form by ever increasing complexity. (Birnbaum more precisely labels this Complexification (see complexfication1000.com).

Moving from the micro to macro, it is clear to see the undeniable raising in complexity at each step. Particles coalesce into atoms; these in turn coalesce into molecules and then compounds; and finally into planets and the stars themselves – which in turn are arranged in solar systems and the greater galaxies they are a part of. The systems continually grow larger and more complex.

Thus, infinitely embedded potentialities are a key component of Q4P. Hence, Infinity #2.

3) Infinitely telescoping-forward in time Quest for Potential?

Potential itself is also inherently telescoping-forward to the forward reaches of time. One example would be the individual human. That single person contains all the Potential of what they can be in terms of growth and complexity. But a person also has the Potential to have children. Thus, within them is not only their own potential, but that of their children and their children’s children ad infinitum. An infinite potential within an infinite potential, nesting without end.

Interestingly, this “future potential” within each person allows Potential its telescoping effect forward in time. All things are both what they are and the infinite sum of what they may someday become. As Potential, this effect exists in all things, not just people. Even dust in the cold of space can someday coalesce into a star.

The stardust from exploding supernova stars ultimately coalesces into that single human just noted in the paragraph just above. We see the direct trajectory from the Big Bang > stars  >  humans >  to their potentially infinite line of descendants.

Further, due to its overarching nature, Potential is the most powerful force shaping the universe around us. It is infinitely nested, thus permeating all levels and scales. More importantly though, Potential is infinitely telescoping forward in time. This is a key to the true power of Potential.

Quest for Potential? telescopes infinitely forward in time. Hence, Infinity #3.

An unending universe of infinities

It can be seen that potential is both infinite and infinitely embedded in multiple ways. It is the eternally infinite eternal origin. As such, it is the only thing that can be truly said to have definitely existed before even the universe itself. This also makes it the only viable catalyst to have –somehow in some manifestation – crafted the cosmos as we know it.

Potential is the prime mover and alpha and omega of universal creation. Quest for Infinite Potential strives infinitely onward  stretching from eternal origins to the far reaches of time.

In December 2014 David Birnbaum was asked directly why he did not notate his concept ?3 (super-superscript. He answered as follows: “There are, indeed, at least three infinities embedded in Quest for Potential – tracking backwards, nested, and telescoping forward; but we are not quite sure how to count them in formal mathematical terms; in any event, we might ultimately be surprised by the true number of embedded infinities; for the record, however, in principle I would have no problem with a super-superscript 3.”

editor’s note: Of course, the journals – online and other – would probably all overload from article  submissions with super-superscripts. As it is, the one superscript infinity ( ? ) causes considerable issues with the journals.

 

DAVID BIRNBAUM PHILOSOPHY / METAPHYSICS

 

Cosmology, Metaphysics & Philosophy: See sample testimonial on Summa Metaphysica, David Birnbaum's philosophy treatise:

 

"the best book in print on the subject."

- HERITAGE JOURNALS

David Birnbaum Philosophy